HomeOther LawsSupreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Section 20(2)(a) of BNSS

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Section 20(2)(a) of BNSS

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court of India has dismissed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 20(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which permits the appointment of a person who “is or has been a Sessions Judge” as Director or Deputy Director of Prosecution.

A Bench led by the Chief Justice of India, while rejecting the plea, termed the challenge “misconceived” and lacking any legal foundation.

The Challenge

The petitioner had contended that Section 20(2)(a) undermines the doctrine of separation of powers by allowing members of the higher judicial service—specifically those who are or have been Sessions Judges—to head the Directorate of Prosecution.

It was argued that enabling judicial officers to occupy executive positions within the prosecution framework compromises judicial independence, a core component of the Constitution’s basic structure. According to the plea, such appointments blur the institutional distinction between the judiciary and the executive, thereby eroding constitutional safeguards.

Court’s Observations

During the hearing, Justice Bagchi clarified the scope of the provision, observing that the phrase “is or has been a Sessions Judge” must be interpreted as an eligibility criterion and not as a mandatory qualification.

“The word has to be read as eligibility and not a mandatory condition,” Justice Bagchi remarked, indicating that the provision merely expands the pool of candidates who may be considered for appointment, rather than mandating that a serving or former Sessions Judge must head the prosecution.

The Chief Justice further observed that the petition was fundamentally flawed. “This is a misconceived challenge and has no legal basis,” the Bench stated, dismissing the plea.

Legal Context

Section 20 of the BNSS deals with the establishment and functioning of the Directorate of Prosecution at the State level. Sub-section (2)(a) provides that the Director of Prosecution and Deputy Director of Prosecution may be appointed from among persons who are or have been Sessions Judges, among other eligible candidates.

The provision forms part of the broader criminal law overhaul enacted in 2023, which replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, with the BNSS as part of a comprehensive restructuring of India’s criminal justice framework.

Read More: No Service Tax on Incentives Received by Car Dealers from Manufacturers: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 18, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 18, 2026.GSTCONSOLIDATION OF SCNS COVERING MULTIPLE...

Mumbai Customs Busts Rs. 64.39 Crore Hydroponic Weed Racket at Airport; 4 Passengers Arrested Under NDPS Act

In a major anti-narcotics operation, officers of the Airport Commissionerate under Mumbai Customs Zone–III...

Attachment of Bank Accounts Despite ITAT Stay Illegal: Delhi HC Quashes Coercive Recovery

The Delhi High Court has set aside the attachment of bank accounts holding that...

No GST Recovery Without Following Law: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court directed the immediate restoration of GST registration of the assessee...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 18, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 18, 2026.GSTCONSOLIDATION OF SCNS COVERING MULTIPLE...

Mumbai Customs Busts Rs. 64.39 Crore Hydroponic Weed Racket at Airport; 4 Passengers Arrested Under NDPS Act

In a major anti-narcotics operation, officers of the Airport Commissionerate under Mumbai Customs Zone–III...

Attachment of Bank Accounts Despite ITAT Stay Illegal: Delhi HC Quashes Coercive Recovery

The Delhi High Court has set aside the attachment of bank accounts holding that...