Jharkhand High Court Slams State Building Construction Corp. for “Dishonest” Review Plea to Evade Settlement, Imposes Rs. 50K Personal Costs

HomeOther LawsJharkhand High Court Slams State Building Construction Corp. for “Dishonest” Review Plea...

Jharkhand High Court Slams State Building Construction Corp. for “Dishonest” Review Plea to Evade Settlement, Imposes Rs. 50K Personal Costs

Other Laws

Published on

13/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jharkhand High Court has dismissed a review petition filed by the Jharkhand State Building Construction Corporation Ltd. (JSBCCL), holding that the attempt to reopen a settled issue was a “dishonest” effort to evade compliance with earlier directions. The Court not only rejected the plea but also imposed personal costs of Rs. 50,000 on the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
State Building Construction

Jharkhand High Court Slams State Building Construction Corp. for “Dishonest” Review Plea to Evade Settlement, Imposes Rs. 50K Personal Costs

Membership Required

Latest articles

Withdrawal of S. 12AB Registration Application Doesn’t Bar CIT(E) From Recording Findings During Inquiry: ITAT

Bright Line Test Can’t Be Used for AMP Expenses: ITAT Deletes Rs. 5.19 Crore Transfer Pricing Addition

Lawyer Seeks Supreme Court’s Intervention Against Delhi Police Over CJP Protest Crackdown; Urges CJI to Take Suo Motu Cognisance

Safdarjung Doctors Flag Patient Rights and Hospital Independence in Sonam Wangchuk Case

More like this

Withdrawal of S. 12AB Registration Application Doesn’t Bar CIT(E) From Recording Findings During Inquiry: ITAT

Bright Line Test Can’t Be Used for AMP Expenses: ITAT Deletes Rs. 5.19 Crore Transfer Pricing Addition

Lawyer Seeks Supreme Court’s Intervention Against Delhi Police Over CJP Protest Crackdown; Urges CJI to Take Suo Motu Cognisance

About us

Company

Categories