HomeOther LawsScrap Seizure Case: Jharkhand High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Scrap Dealer 

Scrap Seizure Case: Jharkhand High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Scrap Dealer 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jharkhand High Court has granted anticipatory bail to a scrap dealer,  Dineshwar Saw who was apprehending arrest in connection with a case involving alleged irregularities linked to the sale of iron scrap. 

The bench Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi has observed that  the petitioner appeared to be a legitimate scrap dealer engaged in regular business, and the prosecution had not shown any criminal antecedent. Taking these factors into account, the Court found grounds to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail. 

The petitioner, Dineshwar Saw, a 62-year-old scrap trader and proprietor of M/s Dineshwar Saw, had moved the High Court seeking protection from arrest in Telaiya Police Station Case No. 240 of 2025, registered under Sections 303(2), 317(2), and 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. 

During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel argued that the seized iron scrap was lawfully owned and not stolen property. It was submitted that the material had been sold through regular business channels to M/s Tushyam Mattel Pvt. Limited, located at Gajhandi Road, Gumo, and that the petitioner held a valid GST registration associated with the transaction. 

It was further emphasized that the petitioner had no prior criminal record, a fact disclosed in the anticipatory bail application. 

Opposing the plea, the State’s counsel contended that the iron scrap in question was indeed sold by the petitioner but raised objections on granting relief. 

The Court directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court within three weeks, and upon such surrender or arrest, be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount. The bail is subject to compliance with the conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. 

Case Details

Case Title: Dineshwar Saw Versus The State of Jharkhand 

Case No.: A. B. A. No. 6205 of 2025

Date: 30.10.2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Manoj 

Counsel For Respondent: Abhay Kr. Tiwari

Read More: Relief To Hyundai: Under Faceless Assessment Regime, Limitation Period to Run From Date of Uploading DRP Order on ITBA Portal: Delhi HC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 12, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 12, 2026.GSTGHAZIABAD DGGI | FIRMS REGISTERED...

Inquiry Can’t Be Bypassed Without Concrete Evidence of Threats: SC Quashes Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable

The Supreme Court has set aside the dismissal of a Delhi Police constable, holding...

CAG Recruitment Dispute: Supreme Court Directs SSC to Forward Dossiers to Enable Appointment of PwD Candidates

The Supreme Court has directed authorities to accommodate two candidates with benchmark disabilities in...

Direct Recruits’ Seniority Begins From Date of Joining, Training Period Counts as Service: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the seniority of directly recruited employees must be...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 12, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 12, 2026.GSTGHAZIABAD DGGI | FIRMS REGISTERED...

Inquiry Can’t Be Bypassed Without Concrete Evidence of Threats: SC Quashes Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable

The Supreme Court has set aside the dismissal of a Delhi Police constable, holding...

CAG Recruitment Dispute: Supreme Court Directs SSC to Forward Dossiers to Enable Appointment of PwD Candidates

The Supreme Court has directed authorities to accommodate two candidates with benchmark disabilities in...