Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsSameer Wankhede vs CBI: Bombay HC Order Out — What It Really...

Sameer Wankhede vs CBI: Bombay HC Order Out — What It Really Says?

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Juris Hour had earlier covered the live courtroom proceedings in the high-profile tussle between the then Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) officer, Sameer Wankhede and the CBI here. Now, with the official order copy finally out, it’s time to unpack what the Bombay High Court has formally recorded — and what it means going forward.

The order was passed by a Division Bench comprising Justice A.S. Gadkari and Justice Rajesh S. Patil on July 8, 2025 and was uploaded on 15 July 2025.

Key Implications of the Bombay HC Order

  1. Interim Protection Confirmed
    The ad-interim relief from arrest, granted in May 2023, is now confirmed as interim relief. Wankhede remains protected from any coercive action by the CBI, unless the Court modifies the order.
  2. CBI Bound by Timeline
    The CBI has committed, on record, to complete its investigation within three months from July 8, 2025. The High Court’s acceptance of this assurance puts the agency under judicial scrutiny and prevents indefinite delays.
  3. No Next Date Fixed By Court

As the court has directed the CBI to complete its investigation within three months, the next date of hearing shall be given subject to the submission of report by CBI.

Case Details

Case Title: Sameer Dyandev Wankhede Vs. Union of India & Ors. 

Case No.: CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1910 OF 2023

Date:  8th July, 2025

Counsel For  Appellant: Senior Advocate Aabad Ponda

Counsel For Respondent: Kuldeep S. Patil

Click Here To Read Order

Read More: Rakt Chandan Racket Busted: Syndicate Used Coconut Fibre Cover to Exploit Customs Loophole via Pune

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...

Can Foreign Assets Be Assessed for AY 2018–19 When the First Black Money Act Notice Was Issued in FY 2018–19? Karnataka High Court Says...

The Karnataka High Court has quashed an assessment concerning two properties in Morocco after...

More like this

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...