HomeOther LawsSameer Wankhede vs CBI: Bombay HC Order Out — What It Really...

Sameer Wankhede vs CBI: Bombay HC Order Out — What It Really Says?

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Juris Hour had earlier covered the live courtroom proceedings in the high-profile tussle between the then Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) officer, Sameer Wankhede and the CBI here. Now, with the official order copy finally out, it’s time to unpack what the Bombay High Court has formally recorded — and what it means going forward.

The order was passed by a Division Bench comprising Justice A.S. Gadkari and Justice Rajesh S. Patil on July 8, 2025 and was uploaded on 15 July 2025.

Key Implications of the Bombay HC Order

  1. Interim Protection Confirmed
    The ad-interim relief from arrest, granted in May 2023, is now confirmed as interim relief. Wankhede remains protected from any coercive action by the CBI, unless the Court modifies the order.
  2. CBI Bound by Timeline
    The CBI has committed, on record, to complete its investigation within three months from July 8, 2025. The High Court’s acceptance of this assurance puts the agency under judicial scrutiny and prevents indefinite delays.
  3. No Next Date Fixed By Court

As the court has directed the CBI to complete its investigation within three months, the next date of hearing shall be given subject to the submission of report by CBI.

Case Details

Case Title: Sameer Dyandev Wankhede Vs. Union of India & Ors. 

Case No.: CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1910 OF 2023

Date:  8th July, 2025

Counsel For  Appellant: Senior Advocate Aabad Ponda

Counsel For Respondent: Kuldeep S. Patil

Click Here To Read Order

Read More: Rakt Chandan Racket Busted: Syndicate Used Coconut Fibre Cover to Exploit Customs Loophole via Pune

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Right to Appeal Against Penalty Under Regulation 18 of Customs Broker Licensing Regulations: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has dismissed...

Courier Company Can’t Be Penalized Under Customs Act In Absence Of Knowledge In Misdeclaration Of Imported Goods: CESTAT

The Delhi bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held...

CBIC Directs Strict Compliance with Court Rulings on Duty Drawback for Export of Unlocked Mobile Phones

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued mandating strict compliance...

No Service Tax Liability Arises on ‘Fake Invoices’: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi Bench, has ruled that...

More like this

No Right to Appeal Against Penalty Under Regulation 18 of Customs Broker Licensing Regulations: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has dismissed...

Courier Company Can’t Be Penalized Under Customs Act In Absence Of Knowledge In Misdeclaration Of Imported Goods: CESTAT

The Delhi bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held...

CBIC Directs Strict Compliance with Court Rulings on Duty Drawback for Export of Unlocked Mobile Phones

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued mandating strict compliance...