Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsREALITY CHECK : Media Influenced By Glamour | No Setback To Sameer...

REALITY CHECK : Media Influenced By Glamour | No Setback To Sameer Wankhede In Defamation Case Against Portrayal In Aryan Khan’s ‘Bads of Bollywood’

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In an important development, the Delhi High Court heard arguments in the matter concerning former NCB officer Sameer Wankhede. The proceedings were centered around the maintainability of the pleadings filed on behalf of the plaintiff.

After considering the submissions made, the Court directed the plaintiff to suitably amend the paragraph pertaining to jurisdiction, in order to ensure that the pleadings fully comply with the requirements of law. The Court observed that jurisdictional aspects are fundamental to the maintainability of a case, and accordingly, necessary corrections must be made before the matter can progress further.

While granting this liberty, the Hon’ble Court clarified that the suit shall remain pending and will be taken up for further hearing once the amendment has been carried out. This direction ensures that the case remains alive, with the plaintiff having been given an opportunity to make the requisite changes in line with legal procedure.

The matter is thus sub judice before the Hon’ble High Court, and the next stage of hearing will take place after the amended pleadings are formally placed on record.

Advocate Jatin Parashar, appearing for Sameer Wankhede, confirmed that the Court’s order allows the plaintiff to bring the pleadings into conformity with the law and continue to pursue the matter.

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...

Why do GST Dept. Recover ITC From Buyers When Suppliers Fail to Deposit Tax?

A purchaser may hold a valid tax invoice, receive the goods or services, pay...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...