Rajasthan Court Rejects Bail Plea in ₹883-Crore Ponzi Scheme Case Linked to Aastha Cooperative Society

HomeOther LawsRajasthan Court Rejects Bail Plea in ₹883-Crore Ponzi Scheme Case Linked to...

Rajasthan Court Rejects Bail Plea in ₹883-Crore Ponzi Scheme Case Linked to Aastha Cooperative Society

Other Laws Top Stories

Published on

13/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Rajasthan Court Rejects Bail Plea in ₹883-Crore Ponzi Scheme Case Linked to Aastha Cooperative Society

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The District and Sessions Court in Jaipur has rejected the bail plea of accused Shetan Singh, one of the key figures in a massive ₹883-crore Ponzi scheme operated under the banner of Aastha Credit Cooperative Society Ltd, registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002. The case, which spans over 38 linked FIRs across Rajasthan,…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Aastha Cooperative Society

Rajasthan Court Rejects Bail Plea in ₹883-Crore Ponzi Scheme Case Linked to Aastha Cooperative Society

Membership Required

Latest articles

No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC

Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court

Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses To Quash Drugs Act Complaint Against Hand Sanitizer Manufacturer Over “Not of Standard Quality” Allegations

More like this

No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC

Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court

Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court

About us

Company

Categories