HomeOther LawsPVR INOX Fined Rs.1.2 Lakh for Delaying Movie Screening with Excessive Ads

PVR INOX Fined Rs.1.2 Lakh for Delaying Movie Screening with Excessive Ads

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a landmark ruling for consumer rights, a Bengaluru consumer court has fined PVR INOX ₹1.2 lakh for delaying a movie screening by 25 minutes due to excessive advertisements. This decision sets a strong precedent against the exploitation of viewers’ time in cinemas.

Consumer Complaint Leads to Landmark Fine

A moviegoer had booked a 4:05 PM show for the film Sam Bahadur. However, the actual screening did not commence until 4:30 PM due to an extended ad segment. As per regulations, theatres can screen only 10 minutes of public service announcements (PSAs) before a film, but PVR INOX ran 25 minutes of ads, with only two out of 17 being PSAs.

Court Imposes ₹1.28 Lakh Penalty on PVR INOX

The court ruled in favor of the complainant, imposing a total penalty of ₹1.28 lakh, broken down as follows:

  • ₹1 lakh as punitive damages for violating consumer rights
  • ₹20,000 for mental agony caused to the viewer
  • ₹8,000 for litigation expenses

New Directives for Theatres

The court’s decision came with key directives aimed at protecting moviegoers:

  • Theatres must disclose the actual movie start time on tickets.
  • Theatres cannot exceed ad limits before screenings.
  • Ticketing platforms like BookMyShow are not liable for delays caused by cinemas.

Read More: Consolidated Notice Leads To Higher Pre-Deposit For Preferring Appeal: Kerala High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Court-Monitored Criminal Investigation in Rs. 100 Crore Estate Dispute Upheld: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the Bombay High Court’s decision directing a court-monitored criminal...

Higher Threshold for Prosecuting Doctors: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Negligence Case Against Anaesthetist

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings initiated against an anaesthetist accused of medical...

Minor Discrepancies Cannot Defeat Motor Accident Compensation Claims: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that minor inconsistencies in records cannot be treated as...

More like this

Court-Monitored Criminal Investigation in Rs. 100 Crore Estate Dispute Upheld: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the Bombay High Court’s decision directing a court-monitored criminal...

Higher Threshold for Prosecuting Doctors: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Negligence Case Against Anaesthetist

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings initiated against an anaesthetist accused of medical...

Minor Discrepancies Cannot Defeat Motor Accident Compensation Claims: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that minor inconsistencies in records cannot be treated as...