Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsMalaika Arora Faces Fresh Bailable Warrant in Saif Ali Khan's 2012 Hotel...

Malaika Arora Faces Fresh Bailable Warrant in Saif Ali Khan’s 2012 Hotel Brawl Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A Mumbai magistrate court on Monday reissued a bailable warrant against Bollywood actor Malaika Arora for failing to appear as a witness in the long-pending 2012 hotel brawl case involving Saif Ali Khan.

Malaika Arora Skips Court Again in High-Profile Assault Case

Despite being summoned earlier, Malaika Arora did not appear before the court. This marks her second absence after the court first issued a bailable warrant on March 15, 2025. Her sister, Amrita Arora Ladak, who was also summoned, deposed before the court on March 29.

Due to Malaika’s continued absence, the court has reissued the ₹5,000 bailable warrant and instructed that a warrant report be submitted by April 29, 2025.

What Happened in the 2012 Saif Ali Khan Brawl Case?

The incident dates back to February 21, 2012, when Saif Ali Khan, Malaika Arora, Amrita Arora, and others were dining at a five-star hotel in South Mumbai. During the meal, a verbal altercation reportedly escalated into a physical confrontation with Iqbal Mir Sharma, a South African national and non-resident Indian (NRI).

Sharma filed a complaint at Colaba police station, alleging that Saif Ali Khan punched him in the nose, causing a fracture. The complaint also named Shakil Ladak (Amrita’s husband) and Bilal Amrohi as co-accused in the assault.

Amrita Arora Testifies in Court

In her testimony on March 29, Amrita Arora stated that it was the complainant, Sharma, who was being aggressive and physically assaulted Saif Ali Khan during the scuffle.

Case Update and Next Hearing

The case has drawn significant public and media attention due to the involvement of several prominent Bollywood personalities. With the reissuance of the bailable warrant, the matter is now scheduled for further hearing following the submission of the warrant report.

Read More: TDS Rate Chart for FY 2025-26 AY 2026-27

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...

Supreme Court Clarifies S. 28A Land Acquisition Limitation

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...