HomeOther LawsLucknow Advocate Sentenced To 10.5-Year Jail for Misusing SC/ST Act with False...

Lucknow Advocate Sentenced To 10.5-Year Jail for Misusing SC/ST Act with False FIRs

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a precedent-setting verdict, a special court in Lucknow has sentenced advocate Lakhan Singh to 10 years and 6 months of rigorous imprisonment for repeatedly abusing the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by filing a series of false First Information Reports (FIRs). The court also imposed a fine of ₹2.51 lakh on Singh.

Misuse of Legal Provisions Uncovered

The judgment, delivered by Special Judge Vivekanand Sharan Tripathi, came after it was revealed that Singh had orchestrated around 20 fake cases under the SC/ST Act against a wide range of individuals, including private citizens, police officers, bureaucrats, and journalists. The court observed that Singh, despite being an officer of the court, had manipulated the justice system for personal or professional gain.

Sharp Rebuke from the Bench

Condemning the actions of the lawyer, Judge Tripathi remarked that Singh had “maligned a responsible profession like advocacy” and had “shaken the foundation of faith in the judicial process.” The court criticized Singh’s conduct as a blatant misuse of legal protections meant to safeguard the vulnerable, noting that his actions had turned the courtroom into a “factory of false litigations.”

The judge emphasized the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence—“It is better that a hundred guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer”—which Singh’s actions had directly violated.

Legal Charges and Sentencing Breakdown

Singh was found guilty under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC):

  • Section 182 (Providing false information to public servants): 6 months’ simple imprisonment and a ₹1,000 fine
  • Section 193 (Giving false evidence): 3 years’ rigorous imprisonment and a ₹50 fine
  • Section 211 (Filing false charges to cause legal harm): 7 years’ rigorous imprisonment and a ₹1,000 fine

The court ordered that the sentences be served consecutively, resulting in a total of 10 years and 6 months in prison.

Read More: Justice M.M. Sundresh Landmark Rulings In Indirect Taxation – GSTAT Interview Candidates Must Know – PART 2

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Pending Regularisation Proceedings Must Be Respected: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Direction

The Supreme Court has set aside a Madras High Court order directing the Chennai...

Pre-2017 Open University Qualifications Can’t Be Used to Deny Promotion: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that an employee who obtained educational qualifications under government-recognised...

Causal Link to Yamuna Floodplain Damage Was Not Established: Supreme Court Quashes NGT’s Environmental Compensation Order

The Supreme Court has set aside the National Green Tribunal’s judgment holding the organiser...

Court Fee Issue in Property Dispute Can’t Be Decided at Threshold Without Evidence on Possession: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has set aside a Punjab and Haryana High Court order that...

More like this

Pending Regularisation Proceedings Must Be Respected: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Direction

The Supreme Court has set aside a Madras High Court order directing the Chennai...

Pre-2017 Open University Qualifications Can’t Be Used to Deny Promotion: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that an employee who obtained educational qualifications under government-recognised...

Causal Link to Yamuna Floodplain Damage Was Not Established: Supreme Court Quashes NGT’s Environmental Compensation Order

The Supreme Court has set aside the National Green Tribunal’s judgment holding the organiser...