Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsLimitation Act Applicable to SARFAESI Proceedings; DRT Can Consider Delay Beyond 45...

Limitation Act Applicable to SARFAESI Proceedings; DRT Can Consider Delay Beyond 45 Days: MP High Court

Other Laws

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Limitation Act Applicable to SARFAESI Proceedings; DRT Can Consider Delay Beyond 45 Days: MP High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madhya Pradesh High Court (Indore Bench) has held that the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to proceedings under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, thereby allowing the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) to consider applications filed beyond the statutory period of 45 days. A Division Bench of Justice Vivek Rusia and Justice Binod Kumar Dwivedi has…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

Cheque Bounce Notice Received By Mother At Correct Address Presumed Served: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a statutory demand notice in a cheque dishonour...
Supreme Court

SARFAESI Auction Can’t Override Mandatory Safeguards: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a confirmed auction sale under the SARFAESI Act...
Supreme Court

Disputed Dues Can’t Be Recovered From Separate Contracts Without Legal Authority: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has set aside a recovery of ₹84.17 lakh from a contractor’s...
Direct Tax

JAO vs FAO Reassessment Dispute: Telangana, Madras HC Reserve Verdicts on S. 147A

The Telangana and Madras High Courts have reportedly reserved their verdicts in matters concerning...

More like this

Supreme Court

Cheque Bounce Notice Received By Mother At Correct Address Presumed Served: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a statutory demand notice in a cheque dishonour...
Supreme Court

SARFAESI Auction Can’t Override Mandatory Safeguards: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a confirmed auction sale under the SARFAESI Act...
Supreme Court

Disputed Dues Can’t Be Recovered From Separate Contracts Without Legal Authority: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has set aside a recovery of ₹84.17 lakh from a contractor’s...