Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsMan Attends Gujarat High Court Hearing from Toilet, Fined Rs. 1 Lakh...

Man Attends Gujarat High Court Hearing from Toilet, Fined Rs. 1 Lakh for Contempt

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a bizarre and shocking incident, the Gujarat High Court has imposed a fine of Rs. 1 lakh on a man who joined a virtual court hearing from a toilet seat and was seen relieving himself on a live video feed.

The incident, which has since gone viral on social media, took place on June 20 during virtual proceedings before Justice Nirzar S Desai. The individual, identified as Samad Abdul Rehman Shah, had logged into the hearing under the name “Samad Battery” and initially appeared in close-up, wearing a Bluetooth headset. Moments later, he placed his phone at a distance, revealing that he was seated on a toilet and was engaged in personal hygiene during the court session.

Taking suo motu cognisance of the act, a Division Bench of Justices AS Supehia and RT Vachhani, during a hearing on Monday, came down heavily on Shah, describing his conduct as “contumacious” and “unacceptable in any civilized judicial process.”

“The contemnor has admitted to his conduct during live-streamed proceedings. At this stage, we direct the contemnor to deposit ₹1 lakh with the court registry before the next hearing,” the Bench stated, warning that imprisonment was also under consideration.

The Court also expressed displeasure with the Registrar (Information & Technology) of the High Court for failing to suggest measures to prevent such incidents in the future. No reply had been filed despite previous directions, prompting the Court to seek further assistance from the Registrar on the matter.

The case has now been listed for further hearing on July 22.

According to records, Shah was appearing as the respondent in a criminal case where he had originally filed the FIR. The matter had reached a settlement between the parties and the FIR was subsequently quashed by the Court.

The episode has raised serious concerns over courtroom decorum in the digital age and the challenges of maintaining dignity during virtual hearings.

Read More: GAIL India’s Pentene Mixture Classified Under Correct Excise Code: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 – SRI SUJIT DAS AND ORS. ETC. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

This Article pertaining to FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 - SRI SUJIT DAS...

GST Notice Despite Advance Ruling: Gujarat High Court Restrains Final Order Without Its Permission

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection to a company challenging proceedings under...

GST Demand Based On Return Scrutiny Requires Prior ASMT-10 Notice: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has set aside a GST demand proceeding involving alleged under-declaration...

Govt. Funding Doesn’t Establish Eligibility For 12% GST On Spinning Mill Construction: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Pune Bench, has upheld 18% GST...

More like this

FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 – SRI SUJIT DAS AND ORS. ETC. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

This Article pertaining to FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 - SRI SUJIT DAS...

GST Notice Despite Advance Ruling: Gujarat High Court Restrains Final Order Without Its Permission

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection to a company challenging proceedings under...

GST Demand Based On Return Scrutiny Requires Prior ASMT-10 Notice: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has set aside a GST demand proceeding involving alleged under-declaration...