Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsForfeiture of Security Deposit Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh...

Forfeiture of Security Deposit Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has quashed the forfeiture of ₹15.67 lakh from a contractor’s security deposit, holding that the action of the State authorities was arbitrary and in clear violation of the principles of natural justice. The Court directed the refund of the deducted amount within four weeks. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Packing Materials Are ‘Inputs’ for Inverted Duty Refund: GSTAT Upholds Refund to Packaged Tea Supplier

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld an inverted...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 3 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 3, 2026.GSTTAXPAYER REVERSED EXCESS CREDIT WITH...

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...

More like this

Packing Materials Are ‘Inputs’ for Inverted Duty Refund: GSTAT Upholds Refund to Packaged Tea Supplier

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld an inverted...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 3 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 3, 2026.GSTTAXPAYER REVERSED EXCESS CREDIT WITH...

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...