“Cross-Examination is Not What to Ask, But What Not to Ask”: Delhi High Court Upholds Late Filing of Documents Triggered by Defendant’s Question

HomeOther Laws“Cross-Examination is Not What to Ask, But What Not to Ask”: Delhi...

“Cross-Examination is Not What to Ask, But What Not to Ask”: Delhi High Court Upholds Late Filing of Documents Triggered by Defendant’s Question

Other Laws Top Stories

Published on

01/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

“Cross-Examination is Not What to Ask, But What Not to Ask”: Delhi High Court Upholds Late Filing of Documents Triggered by Defendant’s Question

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has upheld the late filing of ownership documents triggered by the defendant’s question and stated that “cross-examination is not what to ask, but what not to ask”. The bench of Justice Girish Kathpalia upheld the trial court’s order which had allowed the plaintiff to file a conveyance deed dated September 27,…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

“Cross-Examination is Not What to Ask, But What Not to Ask”: Delhi High Court Upholds Late Filing of Documents Triggered by Defendant’s Question

Membership Required

Latest articles

Demand Fails as Undervaluation Not Proven & Extended Limitation Not Invokable in Stainless Steel Coil Imports Case: CESTAT

Extended Limitation Not Invocable: CESTAT Quashes Major Demands on Jet Airways While Upholding Limited Service Tax Liability

Customs Re-Assessment Before Clearance Can’t Invoke S. 28; Confiscation Not Automatic: CESTAT

Customs Duty Exemption Denied on ABS Components: CESTAT Holds “Suitable for Use” Includes Indirect Use in Motor Vehicles; No IGST Interest/Penalty Pre-Aug 2024

More like this

Demand Fails as Undervaluation Not Proven & Extended Limitation Not Invokable in Stainless Steel Coil Imports Case: CESTAT

Extended Limitation Not Invocable: CESTAT Quashes Major Demands on Jet Airways While Upholding Limited Service Tax Liability

Customs Re-Assessment Before Clearance Can’t Invoke S. 28; Confiscation Not Automatic: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories