Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsCountry is Burning with Judiciary”: Senior Advocate Warns Jharkhand HC Judge to...

Country is Burning with Judiciary”: Senior Advocate Warns Jharkhand HC Judge to Stay Within Limits, Video Goes Viral

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A dramatic courtroom exchange at the Jharkhand High Court, Court No. 24 has gone viral across social media after a Senior Advocate confronted a sitting judge, cautioning him “not to humiliate advocates” and to “stay within his limits.” The incident, reportedly caught on camera, has ignited nationwide debate on the dignity of the judiciary and advocates’ right to be treated with respect in court.

According to initial reports, the altercation unfolded during a heated argument when the senior counsel objected to what he described as “demeaning behaviour” by the Bench. In the video, the lawyer can be heard saying, “The country is burning with judiciary. Please stay within your limits. You cannot humiliate advocates in open court.”

The statement instantly created a stir both inside and outside legal circles, with several lawyers and bar associations reacting sharply — some defending the advocate’s outburst as a stand against judicial arrogance, while others termed it contemptuous and unbecoming of a senior officer of the court.

While the High Court has not issued an official statement yet, sources suggest that the matter could be taken up by the Bar Council or the Chief Justice for review, given its serious implications on courtroom decorum and the advocate-judge relationship.

The clip, now widely circulated on X (formerly Twitter), has triggered thousands of comments, with users divided between those hailing the advocate’s courage to speak truth to power, and others warning that open defiance in court could erode institutional respect.

Read More: Disadvantages Of Senior Citizen Savings Scheme

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Service Tax Appeal Filed Beyond Statutory Three-Month Limit Can’t Be Entertained: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that the...

Income Tax Officer Can’t Use Last-Minute Valuation Reference to Extend Assessment Limitation: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has quashed an Income Tax Department reference made to the...

Service Tax Penalty Can’t Survive When Assessee Acted on Dept.’s Own View of Non-Taxability: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has set aside a ₹4.5 lakh service tax penalty imposed...

More like this

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Service Tax Appeal Filed Beyond Statutory Three-Month Limit Can’t Be Entertained: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that the...

Income Tax Officer Can’t Use Last-Minute Valuation Reference to Extend Assessment Limitation: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has quashed an Income Tax Department reference made to the...