HomeOther LawsCBI Corruption Case: Madras High Court Sentences Ex-DRT Officials To 5 Years...

CBI Corruption Case: Madras High Court Sentences Ex-DRT Officials To 5 Years Rigorous Imprisonment  With Rs. 27 Lakh Fine

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court sentences five accused including then Recovery Officer and then Official of DRT, then Branch Manager of Dhanalakshmi Bank and two others to 5 years’ Rigorous Imprisonment with total fine of Rs 27 lakh in a CBI case.

The Madras High Court has pronounced sentence against five accused including Shri S. Kasimayan, then Recovery Officer and Shri Selvaraj, then UDC, both of DRT, Madurai; Shri N. Venkeeshwaran, then Branch Manager of Dhanalakshmi Bank, Madurai and two private persons namely Shri R. Rajesh Kannan and Smt. R. Anitha w/o of accused UDC of DRT, Madurai. They were earlier acquitted by Trial Court. The accused were sentenced to 5 years’ Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) with total fine of Rs 27 lakh in a case of abuse of official position in fixing Upset price of properties at lower than the market value.

 CBI had registered the instant case on 30.03.2009 against the said accused. It was alleged that accused Shri Kasimayan, then Recovery officer of DRT, Madurai fraudulently fixed the Upset prices of the properties, much lesser than the market value in the year 2008. All the accused conspired together, causing thereby a wrongful loss to the Bank and the property Owner and corresponding wrongful gain/ pecuniary advantage to themselves.

 After completion of investigation, CBI had filed chargesheet on 06.06.2011 against accused including the accused convicted by the Court. The Trial Court its order dated 07.12.2016 acquitted all the accused persons. CBI filed Criminal Appeal against the acquittal.

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, upholding CBI appeal, sentenced accused Shri S.Kasimayan, then Recovery Officer and Shri N. Vakeeshwaran, then Branch Manager of Dhanalakshmi Bank, Madurai, to 5years’ RI with fine of Rs 6 lakh each and Shri Selvaraj, then UDC of DRT and two private persons namely Shri R. Rajesh Kannan and Smt. R. Anitha W/o Shri R Selvaraj were sentenced to 5 years’ RI with fine of Rs. 5 lakh each.

In the meantime one of the accused had approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. And the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its order dated 27.03.2025 directed that the High Court may proceed to hear the parties on the issue of sentencing and the sentence, if pronounced, shall remain suspended for a period of three week from today (27.03.2025). The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court has accordingly suspended the sentence pronounced.

Click Here To Read Press Release

Read More: Unlawful Overnight Detention of Goregaon Businessman By CGST Officials: CBI Files Chargesheet Against Two IRS Officers

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Credit Can’t Be Denied Repair And Maintenance Services Of Plant And Machinery By Categorising As Work Contract: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC

The Tripura High Court has held that mere uploading of an adjudication order on...

More like this

Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Credit Can’t Be Denied Repair And Maintenance Services Of Plant And Machinery By Categorising As Work Contract: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...