HomeOther LawsUnaccounted Cash Discovery: Delhi High Court Withdraws Judicial Work from Justice Yashwant...

Unaccounted Cash Discovery: Delhi High Court Withdraws Judicial Work from Justice Yashwant Varma 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has officially withdrawn judicial work from Justice Yashwant Varma with immediate effect following allegations regarding the discovery of unaccounted cash at an outhouse within his residential premises. The decision was announced through a notice published on the official website of the Delhi High Court.

Supreme Court’s Directive and In-House Inquiry Committee

The Supreme Court had earlier directed the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court not to assign any judicial work to Justice Yashwant Varma. In response to these developments, the Chief Justice of India has constituted a three-member committee to conduct an inquiry into the allegations, as part of the in-house procedure.

The members of the inquiry committee include:

  • Justice Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice of the Punjab & Haryana High Court
  • Justice GS Sandhawalia, Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh
  • Justice Anu Sivaraman, Judge of the High Court of Karnataka

Justice Varma’s Denial of Allegations

Justice Yashwant Varma has strongly denied all allegations in his response submitted to Delhi High Court Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya. He has stated that the allegations are part of a conspiracy to frame him.

Additionally, Justice Varma clarified that the room where the alleged unaccounted cash was reportedly found is not part of his official residence but a separate storeroom that is disconnected from the main premises. He has also dismissed reports suggesting that any cash was ever placed in the storeroom, refuting claims made in a Times of India report.

What Lies Ahead?

With judicial work withdrawn and an ongoing inquiry, the future of Justice Varma’s position remains uncertain. The findings of the in-house committee will play a crucial role in determining the next steps in this high-profile case.

Read More: 0 Export Duty Payable On Onion W.E.F. April 1st, 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 11, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for April 11, 2026.GSTPRE-DEPOSIT FIELD NOW MADE EDITABLE...

Income Tax Dept. Introduces Form 121, Replaces Forms 15G and 15H

The Income Tax Department has introduced a new unified declaration form—Form No. 121—aimed at...

CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift under Finance Act, 2023

The article titled “CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A...

GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR

The Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that while the “margin scheme”...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 11, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for April 11, 2026.GSTPRE-DEPOSIT FIELD NOW MADE EDITABLE...

Income Tax Dept. Introduces Form 121, Replaces Forms 15G and 15H

The Income Tax Department has introduced a new unified declaration form—Form No. 121—aimed at...

CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift under Finance Act, 2023

The article titled “CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A...