Builder To Pay 12% Interest On Refund For Giving Delayed Flat Possession To Homebuyer: Delhi Consumer Commission [READ ORDER]

HomeOther LawsBuilder To Pay 12% Interest On Refund For Giving Delayed Flat Possession...

Builder To Pay 12% Interest On Refund For Giving Delayed Flat Possession To Homebuyer: Delhi Consumer Commission [READ ORDER]

Other Laws Top Stories

Published on

18/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Builder To Pay 12% Interest On Refund For Giving Delayed Flat Possession To Homebuyer: Delhi Consumer Commission [READ ORDER]

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has modified a 2016 District Forum order and directed Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd. to pay 12% annual simple interest—instead of 6%—on the refund of ₹3.24 lakh for failing to hand over possession of a flat booked more than three decades ago. The bench of Presiding Member Bimla Kumari…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Interest On Refund

Builder To Pay 12% Interest On Refund For Giving Delayed Flat Possession To Homebuyer: Delhi Consumer Commission [READ ORDER]

Membership Required

Latest articles

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 96 Crore Reassessment Citing ‘Change of Opinion’, Limitation Bar

More like this

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

About us

Company

Categories