Builder To Pay 12% Interest On Refund For Giving Delayed Flat Possession To Homebuyer: Delhi Consumer Commission [READ ORDER]

HomeOther LawsBuilder To Pay 12% Interest On Refund For Giving Delayed Flat Possession...

Builder To Pay 12% Interest On Refund For Giving Delayed Flat Possession To Homebuyer: Delhi Consumer Commission [READ ORDER]

Other Laws Top Stories

Published on

18/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Builder To Pay 12% Interest On Refund For Giving Delayed Flat Possession To Homebuyer: Delhi Consumer Commission [READ ORDER]

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has modified a 2016 District Forum order and directed Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd. to pay 12% annual simple interest—instead of 6%—on the refund of ₹3.24 lakh for failing to hand over possession of a flat booked more than three decades ago. The bench of Presiding Member Bimla Kumari…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Interest On Refund

Builder To Pay 12% Interest On Refund For Giving Delayed Flat Possession To Homebuyer: Delhi Consumer Commission [READ ORDER]

Membership Required

Latest articles

No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC

Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court

Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses To Quash Drugs Act Complaint Against Hand Sanitizer Manufacturer Over “Not of Standard Quality” Allegations

More like this

No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC

Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court

Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court

About us

Company

Categories