HomeOther LawsBombay High Court Slams 9 Year Delay, Orders Refund of Rs. 21...

Bombay High Court Slams 9 Year Delay, Orders Refund of Rs. 21 Lakh Stamp Duty with Interest

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has quashed a 2015 order of the stamp authorities and directed the Maharashtra government to refund ₹21 lakh in stamp duty—pending for nearly nine years—to the petitioners, along with interest. The bench of Justice Amit Borkar has directed the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Maharashtra to issue a circular within…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Dept. Can’t Attach Bank Accounts of Independent Firms to Recover Another Company’s Tax Dues: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the GST Department cannot invoke recovery provisions...

Revenue Neutrality Must Be Proven with Evidence, Not Assumptions: Madras High Court Restores Rs. 20.37 Crore Excise Demand

The Madras High Court has held that an assessee cannot escape excise duty merely...

Time-Barred SCN Can’t Sustain Service Tax Demand Against Sub-Contractor: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

Client Code Modification Allegations Can’t Stand Without Independent Evidence: ITAT 

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted additions exceeding...

More like this

GST Dept. Can’t Attach Bank Accounts of Independent Firms to Recover Another Company’s Tax Dues: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the GST Department cannot invoke recovery provisions...

Revenue Neutrality Must Be Proven with Evidence, Not Assumptions: Madras High Court Restores Rs. 20.37 Crore Excise Demand

The Madras High Court has held that an assessee cannot escape excise duty merely...

Time-Barred SCN Can’t Sustain Service Tax Demand Against Sub-Contractor: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...