Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationSupreme Court Bar Association Urges Live Streaming of Waqf Board Case Due...

Supreme Court Bar Association Urges Live Streaming of Waqf Board Case Due to Overcrowding and Fainting Incident

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has formally requested the live streaming of the high-profile case W.P.(C) No. 269/2025 – Asaduddin Owaisi vs Union of India, pertaining to the Waqf Board, following severe overcrowding in Court No. 1 of the Supreme Court of India on April 16, 2025.

According to a letter addressed to Mr. H. S. Jaggi, Registrar (Technology) of the Supreme Court, the SCBA highlighted that the courtroom was “overcrowded leaving no space to sit or stand,” which led to “suffocation/claustrophobia among the Members.” Disturbingly, two advocates fainted inside the courtroom due to the congestion.

The letter, signed by Vikrant Yadav, Honorary Secretary of SCBA, emphasized the need for live-streaming proceedings of the case whenever it is listed, to mitigate health risks, reduce courtroom crowding, and ensure safe access to justice.

“You are therefore requested to direct the concerned authorities to provide the live streaming link to SCBA whenever this case is listed,” the letter stated.

The plea for live streaming aligns with the Supreme Court’s push for greater transparency and accessibility in judicial proceedings. The Wakf Board case, involving public interest and significant constitutional questions, has drawn considerable attention from legal practitioners, media, and civil society.

The SCBA’s request is expected to set a precedent for handling overcrowded court hearings and may pave the way for broader adoption of live streaming in sensitive and high-demand cases.

Read More: Updated Timelines for SCN & Order Issuance Under Sections 73 and 74 of CGST Act, 2017

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Writ Appeal Bench Can’t Reverse a Just and Reasonable Order Merely Because It Takes a Different View: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a High Court’s Division Bench hearing a Letters...

Public Property Auction Can Be Cancelled Before Conveyance If Price Is Substantially Low Despite Full Payment: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the Chandigarh Administration’s decision to cancel the auction of...

Temple Inam Land Can’t Be Gifted To Govt. Even For Public Purpose: Supreme Court Imposes ₹1 Lakh Costs

The Supreme Court has held that temple inam land cannot be gifted to the...

More like this

Writ Appeal Bench Can’t Reverse a Just and Reasonable Order Merely Because It Takes a Different View: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a High Court’s Division Bench hearing a Letters...

Public Property Auction Can Be Cancelled Before Conveyance If Price Is Substantially Low Despite Full Payment: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the Chandigarh Administration’s decision to cancel the auction of...