HomeNotificationRevised Time Limit For E-Invoice Reporting: Businesses With AATO of Rs. 10...

Revised Time Limit For E-Invoice Reporting: Businesses With AATO of Rs. 10 Crores & Above Must Comply By April 1, 2025

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant regulatory update, the government has extended the e-invoice reporting deadline to a wider taxpayer base. Effective April 1, 2025, businesses with an annual aggregate turnover (AATO) of Rs. 10 crores or more will be required to report their e-invoices within 30 days from the invoice date.

Key Changes in E-Invoicing Compliance:

Previously, this 30-day reporting mandate applied only to businesses with an AATO of Rs. 100 crores and above.

Now, the compliance requirement has been extended to businesses with an AATO of ₹10 crores and above.

The Invoice Registration Portal (IRP) will reject invoices that are older than 30 days, making timely reporting crucial.

Implications for Businesses:

For example, an invoice issued on April 1, 2025, must be reported by April 30, 2025. Failure to do so will result in rejection, impacting compliance and potentially causing disruptions in input tax credit claims.

Read More: Madras High Court Condones 210 Days Delay In Filing GST Appeal Subject To 25% Pre-Deposit 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Realty Director for Failure to Settle Homebuyer Claims and Violation of Bail Conditions

The Supreme Court has cancelled the bail granted to realty developer Satinder Singh Bhasin,...

SCN Must Clearly Indicate Intent to Blacklist: Supreme Court Quashes 5-Year Debarment, Upholds Contract Termination

The Supreme Court has held that blacklisting of contractors cannot be imposed mechanically without...

Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case

The Supreme Court has held that higher-ranking officials can justifiably face stricter punishment compared...

Who Will Lead the Dargah? Supreme Court Says Nominee Has the Final Say

The Supreme Court has upheld the appointment of a Sajjadanashin (spiritual head) of a...

More like this

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Realty Director for Failure to Settle Homebuyer Claims and Violation of Bail Conditions

The Supreme Court has cancelled the bail granted to realty developer Satinder Singh Bhasin,...

SCN Must Clearly Indicate Intent to Blacklist: Supreme Court Quashes 5-Year Debarment, Upholds Contract Termination

The Supreme Court has held that blacklisting of contractors cannot be imposed mechanically without...

Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case

The Supreme Court has held that higher-ranking officials can justifiably face stricter punishment compared...