HomeNotification10% Pre-Deposit On Only Penalty For Filing 1st GST Appeal Yet To Be...

10% Pre-Deposit On Only Penalty For Filing 1st GST Appeal Yet To Be Notified

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Taxpayers contesting penalty-only assessments under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continue to await formal notification of a proposed reduction in the mandatory pre-deposit requirement for first appeals. 

Despite the GST Council’s recommendation to lower the pre-deposit from 25% to 10% of the penalty amount, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has not yet issued the necessary notification to implement this change.

During its 55th meeting on December 21, 2024, the GST Council proposed amending Sections 107 and 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017. This amendment aimed to facilitate the appeals process for cases involving only penalties, without any associated tax demand. The Council suggested reducing the pre-deposit requirement to 10% of the penalty amount to alleviate the financial burden on taxpayers. 

However, as of April 29, 2025, the CBIC has not issued a notification to enforce this proposed amendment. Consequently, taxpayers appealing penalty-only orders are still subject to the existing 25% pre-deposit requirement.​

In contrast, the CBIC has implemented other changes to pre-deposit requirements. Effective November 1, 2024, the pre-deposit for appeals involving disputed tax amounts was reduced to 10%, with caps lowered to Rs. 20 crore for CGST and SGST, and Rs. 40 crore for IGST.  These changes, however, do not extend to penalty-only appeals.​

The delay in notifying the reduced pre-deposit for penalty-only appeals has led to uncertainty among taxpayers and professionals. Many are hopeful that the CBIC will soon formalize the amendment, aligning the procedural requirements with the GST Council’s recommendations and providing relief to those challenging penalty assessments.

Read More: Amount Paid Under Protest After Clearance Of Goods Is Not Covered By Unjust Enrichment: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

What Is an IPO? How IPOs Make Founders, Promoters and Company Owners Rich

An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is one of the most important events in a...

SpaceX’s Historic IPO Pushes Valuation Beyond $2 Trillion; Elon Musk Becomes World’s First ‘Trillionaire’ on Paper

SpaceX made a blockbuster debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange, with its shares surging...

CESTAT Quashes Confiscation and Penalty on Excess Imported Soybean Oil

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

What Is an IPO? How IPOs Make Founders, Promoters and Company Owners Rich

An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is one of the most important events in a...

SpaceX’s Historic IPO Pushes Valuation Beyond $2 Trillion; Elon Musk Becomes World’s First ‘Trillionaire’ on Paper

SpaceX made a blockbuster debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange, with its shares surging...

CESTAT Quashes Confiscation and Penalty on Excess Imported Soybean Oil

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...