Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationNo Manual HSN Entry in GSTR-1 & GSTR-1A from April 2025: GSTN...

No Manual HSN Entry in GSTR-1 & GSTR-1A from April 2025: GSTN Rolls Out Phase-III for Table-12

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant update for GST filers, the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) is set to roll out Phase-III of Table 12 in GSTR-1 and GSTR-1A, with effect from the tax period beginning April 1, 2025. The change marks a decisive move towards enhancing data accuracy and automation in return filing.

Starting this April, manual entry of HSN (Harmonized System of Nomenclature) codes will no longer be permittedin Table-12 of GSTR-1 and GSTR-1A. Taxpayers will now be required to select HSN codes from a system-provided drop-down menu, ensuring standardisation and eliminating inconsistencies caused by free-text input.

Table-12, which captures HSN-wise summary of outward supplies, has undergone a structural bifurcation into two distinct sections:

  • B2B (Business-to-Business)
  • B2C (Business-to-Consumer)

This segregation aims to streamline reporting and enhance visibility across different types of transactions.

Along with the new structure, validation checks on the value of supplies and tax amounts have been integrated into both B2B and B2C tabs. These validations are expected to reduce reporting errors and support more efficient reconciliation processes.

Implications for Taxpayers

This reform underscores GSTN’s commitment to automation and error-reduction in tax compliance. Businesses and tax professionals are advised to:

  • Familiarise themselves with the drop-down based HSN selection process;
  • Ensure that their ERP or accounting software aligns with the updated structure; and
  • Cross-check classification codes regularly for accuracy in selection.

The GSTN is expected to issue a detailed user manual and conduct awareness drives to support this transition.

Read More: Delhi High Court Quashes Customs Order Confiscating Shawls, Branded Apparel, Liquor For Lack Of SCN

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 16, 2026.GSTGST REVOCATION ORDER QUASHED AFTER...

CBIC Circulars Not Binding On GSTAT; Inverted Duty Refund Available Where Inputs And Finished Goods Are Distinct: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...

Money Received by Intermediary Not Enough to Prove Public Servant Accepted Bribe: Supreme Court Acquits RPF Officer

The Supreme Court has acquitted a former Divisional Security Commissioner of the Railway Protection...

Loan Recovery Can’t Become “Instrument of Oppression”: Supreme Court Awards Rs.10 Lakh Compensation for Midnight Repossession of Truck

The Supreme Court has strongly deprecated the forcible repossession of a borrower’s truck by...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 16, 2026.GSTGST REVOCATION ORDER QUASHED AFTER...

CBIC Circulars Not Binding On GSTAT; Inverted Duty Refund Available Where Inputs And Finished Goods Are Distinct: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...

Money Received by Intermediary Not Enough to Prove Public Servant Accepted Bribe: Supreme Court Acquits RPF Officer

The Supreme Court has acquitted a former Divisional Security Commissioner of the Railway Protection...