Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationFAKE NEWS ALERT | BCI Introduces Mandatory Minimum Fee Structure for Advocates...

FAKE NEWS ALERT | BCI Introduces Mandatory Minimum Fee Structure for Advocates Across India

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a recent wave of misinformation, social media platforms have been abuzz with claims that the Bar Council of India (BCI) has introduced a mandatory minimum fee structure for advocates practicing across the country. The news, which spread like wildfire, alleges that advocates will now be required to charge clients a standard minimum fee depending on the nature of the legal services provided.

“In exercise of the powers conferred under the Advocates Act, 1961, the Bar Council of India hereby notifies the mandatory minimum fee structure applicable to all practicing advocates across India. This structure shall be followed by all advocates from March 1, 2025. The prescribed minimum fees are fixed, while the maximum fees may vary depending upon the seniority and expertise of the advocate,” the fake notification read.

Read More: Section 271AAA Relief: No 10% Penalty If Undisclosed Income Is Admitted, Substantiated, and Tax Paid Even with Delay: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Customs Brokers Can’t Rely Solely On Importer’s Documents When Gold-Origin Certificates Remain Unverified: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has dismissed a customs broker’s writ petition challenging an adjudication...

CESTAT Has No Jurisdiction Over Baggage Disputes: Madras High Court Condones 37-Day Delay In Gold Confiscation Revision

The Madras High Court has held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

GST Portal Notices Going Unanswered? Officers Must Explore Other Modes of Service: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that GST officers should explore alternative modes of...

More like this

Customs Brokers Can’t Rely Solely On Importer’s Documents When Gold-Origin Certificates Remain Unverified: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has dismissed a customs broker’s writ petition challenging an adjudication...

CESTAT Has No Jurisdiction Over Baggage Disputes: Madras High Court Condones 37-Day Delay In Gold Confiscation Revision

The Madras High Court has held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...