Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationFAKE NEWS ALERT | BCI Introduces Mandatory Minimum Fee Structure for Advocates...

FAKE NEWS ALERT | BCI Introduces Mandatory Minimum Fee Structure for Advocates Across India

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a recent wave of misinformation, social media platforms have been abuzz with claims that the Bar Council of India (BCI) has introduced a mandatory minimum fee structure for advocates practicing across the country. The news, which spread like wildfire, alleges that advocates will now be required to charge clients a standard minimum fee depending on the nature of the legal services provided.

“In exercise of the powers conferred under the Advocates Act, 1961, the Bar Council of India hereby notifies the mandatory minimum fee structure applicable to all practicing advocates across India. This structure shall be followed by all advocates from March 1, 2025. The prescribed minimum fees are fixed, while the maximum fees may vary depending upon the seniority and expertise of the advocate,” the fake notification read.

Read More: Section 271AAA Relief: No 10% Penalty If Undisclosed Income Is Admitted, Substantiated, and Tax Paid Even with Delay: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DRC-01 Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: GSTAT  

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Division Bench, has delivered a...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 14 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 14, 2026.GSTGST DEPT. CANT ADJUST SANCTIONED...

No GST On Recovery Of Electricity Charges At Actual Cost Without Markup: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has held that electricity charges recovered...

18% GST On New Water Pipeline Construction: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has ruled that works involving the...

More like this

DRC-01 Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: GSTAT  

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Division Bench, has delivered a...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 14 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 14, 2026.GSTGST DEPT. CANT ADJUST SANCTIONED...

No GST On Recovery Of Electricity Charges At Actual Cost Without Markup: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR) has held that electricity charges recovered...