HomeNotificationFAKE NEWS ALERT | BCI Introduces Mandatory Minimum Fee Structure for Advocates...

FAKE NEWS ALERT | BCI Introduces Mandatory Minimum Fee Structure for Advocates Across India

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a recent wave of misinformation, social media platforms have been abuzz with claims that the Bar Council of India (BCI) has introduced a mandatory minimum fee structure for advocates practicing across the country. The news, which spread like wildfire, alleges that advocates will now be required to charge clients a standard minimum fee depending on the nature of the legal services provided.

“In exercise of the powers conferred under the Advocates Act, 1961, the Bar Council of India hereby notifies the mandatory minimum fee structure applicable to all practicing advocates across India. This structure shall be followed by all advocates from March 1, 2025. The prescribed minimum fees are fixed, while the maximum fees may vary depending upon the seniority and expertise of the advocate,” the fake notification read.

Read More: Section 271AAA Relief: No 10% Penalty If Undisclosed Income Is Admitted, Substantiated, and Tax Paid Even with Delay: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Poultry Cage Weld Mesh

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Commission Retained on Air Tickets Bought Through GSA/IATA Agents Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Duty-Paid Inputs from Area-Based Exempt Units: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Ignoring Taxpayer’s Reply While Rejecting GST Refund Is Illegal: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has set aside an ex-parte order rejecting a GST refund...

More like this

CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Poultry Cage Weld Mesh

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Commission Retained on Air Tickets Bought Through GSA/IATA Agents Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Duty-Paid Inputs from Area-Based Exempt Units: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...