HomeNotificationFAKE NEWS ALERT | BCI Introduces Mandatory Minimum Fee Structure for Advocates...

FAKE NEWS ALERT | BCI Introduces Mandatory Minimum Fee Structure for Advocates Across India

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a recent wave of misinformation, social media platforms have been abuzz with claims that the Bar Council of India (BCI) has introduced a mandatory minimum fee structure for advocates practicing across the country. The news, which spread like wildfire, alleges that advocates will now be required to charge clients a standard minimum fee depending on the nature of the legal services provided.

“In exercise of the powers conferred under the Advocates Act, 1961, the Bar Council of India hereby notifies the mandatory minimum fee structure applicable to all practicing advocates across India. This structure shall be followed by all advocates from March 1, 2025. The prescribed minimum fees are fixed, while the maximum fees may vary depending upon the seniority and expertise of the advocate,” the fake notification read.

Read More: Section 271AAA Relief: No 10% Penalty If Undisclosed Income Is Admitted, Substantiated, and Tax Paid Even with Delay: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

TDS Credit Can’t Be Restrict Due to Mismatch Between Form 26AS and ITR While Processing Return: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench has held that the Central Processing...

Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked for SAD Demand on FTWZ–DTA Stock Transfers: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Meerut DGGI | Court Denies Bail to Transporter Accused of Moving Areca Nuts Worth Rs. 5,000 Crore Without E-Way Bills

A Meerut court has rejected the bail application of Dilip Kumar Jha, a transporter...

MPID Act Overrides Income Tax, PMLA Claims: Bombay High Court Upholds Release of Seized Rs. 60 Crore for Investor Repayment 

The Bombay High Court while upholding the release of seized Rs. 60 Crore for...

More like this

TDS Credit Can’t Be Restrict Due to Mismatch Between Form 26AS and ITR While Processing Return: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench has held that the Central Processing...

Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked for SAD Demand on FTWZ–DTA Stock Transfers: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Meerut DGGI | Court Denies Bail to Transporter Accused of Moving Areca Nuts Worth Rs. 5,000 Crore Without E-Way Bills

A Meerut court has rejected the bail application of Dilip Kumar Jha, a transporter...