HomeNotificationMaharashtra Enacts Major GST Amendments for 2025, Introduces Track-and-Trace for Certain Goods

Maharashtra Enacts Major GST Amendments for 2025, Introduces Track-and-Trace for Certain Goods

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Maharashtra Government has notified the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2025, introducing significant changes to the state’s GST framework, including a new track-and-trace mechanism, modifications in appeal procedures, and several retrospective amendments. 

The law received the Governor’s assent on July 30, 2025, and has been published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette.

Key Amendments

  1. New Definitions and Clarifications

The definition of “unique identification marking” has been added, covering digital stamps, digital marks, and other secure, non-removable identifiers for goods. Clarifications have been made to terms like “local fund” and “municipal fund” to bring them in line with local self-government financial structures.

  1. Track-and-Trace Mechanism (Section 148A)

A major new provision empowers the government to mandate unique identification markings for specified goods. Manufacturers, importers, and certain dealers will be required to affix such markings, maintain detailed records, and disclose machinery details used in production. Non-compliance will attract a penalty of ₹1 lakh or 10% of the tax payable, whichever is higher.

  1. Changes in Input Tax Credit Provisions

Retrospective amendment from July 1, 2017, replacing “plant or machinery” with “plant and machinery” to settle interpretational disputes. The amendment overrides contrary judicial rulings.

  1. Procedural Changes in Tax Invoicing and Returns

Changes in sections relating to tax statements, return filing, and issuance of credit notes, including new conditions to prevent reduction of output tax liability unless the recipient reverses related input tax credit.

  1. Appeal Process Overhaul

New provisions for appeals in cases involving penalties without associated tax demand. A 10% pre-deposit of penalty is now mandatory for both first appeals (Section 107) and further appeals (Section 112).

  1. Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Transactions

Retrospective amendment from July 1, 2017, classifying certain supplies within SEZs and Free Trade Warehousing Zones as “neither supply of goods nor supply of services,” thereby keeping them outside the GST ambit.

  1. No Refund Clause

Section 15 of the amendment bars refunds of tax collected on transactions that would have been exempt under the newly inserted provisions if they had been in force earlier.

Read More: Supreme Court Upholds CJI’s Power to Initiate In-House Judicial Inquiries : Detailed Analysis

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 24, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 24, 2026.GSTGST REGISTRATION CANCELLATION INVALID WITHOUT...

Invalid Invocation of S. 73 for GTO Service Recipients Leads to Quashing of Service Tax Demand: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench has held that...

Service Tax Demand on Limitation Grounds Quashed, Holds No Suppression Without Intent to Evade: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench, has set aside...

Retrospective Applicability of Beneficial DGFT Notification: CESTAT Allows Home Consumption of Confiscated Goods

The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has permitted...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 24, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 24, 2026.GSTGST REGISTRATION CANCELLATION INVALID WITHOUT...

Invalid Invocation of S. 73 for GTO Service Recipients Leads to Quashing of Service Tax Demand: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench has held that...

Service Tax Demand on Limitation Grounds Quashed, Holds No Suppression Without Intent to Evade: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench, has set aside...