HomeNotificationICSI Notifies 4th Grievance Redressal Hearing by ROC Delhi on February 26

ICSI Notifies 4th Grievance Redressal Hearing by ROC Delhi on February 26

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) has informed its members about the 4th Grievance / Query Redressal Hearing to be conducted by the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana. The hearing is scheduled to take place on February 26, 2026, from 11:00 AM to 1:30 PM in South Delhi.

In a communication dated February 25, 2026, the Institute stated that the initiative is aimed at addressing service delivery-related issues faced by stakeholders. The hearings are part of a regular mechanism under which the ROC may conduct physical interactions on the 15th and 30th of every month. If these dates fall on a weekend, the hearing is held on the next working day.

The upcoming session will be conducted by the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana and will focus exclusively on grievances pertaining to companies falling under the jurisdiction of ROC NCT of Delhi I at South Delhi.

Venue and Scope of Hearing

The hearing will be held at the office of the ROC located at 4th Floor, IFCI Tower, 61, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019.

Stakeholders may raise issues relating to Company Registration Forms (CRFs), technical problems including annual filing, and pre-filing queries. However, only matters within the specified jurisdiction will be entertained during the session.

Documentation and Authorisation Requirements

The Institute has advised that individuals representing companies before the ROC must carry all relevant documents concerning the grievance or query. Proper authorisation or a Power of Attorney from the concerned company is mandatory to facilitate seamless proceedings.

ICSI, a statutory body functioning under the administrative jurisdiction of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, reiterated its commitment to supporting professional members and ensuring efficient coordination between stakeholders and regulatory authorities.

The Institute expressed appreciation for the continued cooperation of professionals and encouraged members facing compliance or filing-related challenges to make effective use of the grievance redressal platform.

Read More: Xiaomi Moves Supreme Court Against $72 Million Customs Duty Demand Over Royalty Payments

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : FEBRUARY 25, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for February 25, 2026.GSTDUTY OF APPELLATE AUTHORITY TO...

Supreme Court Upholds Hereditary Pujari Rights; Dismisses Appeals In Century-Old Amogasidda Temple Dispute

The Supreme Court has  upheld the hereditary Pujari Rights and dismissed the appeals in...

Criminal Proceedings Can’t Be Used to Settle Purely Civil Contract Disputes: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that criminal proceedings cannot be used to settle disputes...

S. 143 Conversion Bars Regularisation U/s 123 of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the regularisation of possession of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : FEBRUARY 25, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for February 25, 2026.GSTDUTY OF APPELLATE AUTHORITY TO...

Supreme Court Upholds Hereditary Pujari Rights; Dismisses Appeals In Century-Old Amogasidda Temple Dispute

The Supreme Court has  upheld the hereditary Pujari Rights and dismissed the appeals in...

Criminal Proceedings Can’t Be Used to Settle Purely Civil Contract Disputes: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that criminal proceedings cannot be used to settle disputes...