Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationDGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP

DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has  revised the HS code description for screws under Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products (RoDTEP) Scheme to align with customs tariff norms.

Previously, HS Code 73181500 was narrowly described as: “Screw for use in manufacture of cellular mobile phone”.

HS CodeExisting DescriptionRevised Description
73181500Screw for use in manufacture of cellular mobile phoneOther screws and bolts, whether or not with their nuts or washers

This restrictive description has now been replaced with a broader and more generic classification: “Other screws and bolts, whether or not with their nuts or washers”

This change brings the RoDTEP classification in line with the corresponding entry under the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

The government clarified that the amendment is purely corrective in nature and is intended to align the RoDTEP schedule with the standard customs tariff classification. Such alignment is crucial to eliminate ambiguity, ensure uniform interpretation, and avoid disputes during export benefit claims.

The earlier description, being product-specific, had the potential to restrict eligibility or create confusion for exporters dealing in general fasteners falling under the same HS code.

The notification provides retrospective effect to the amendment from December 15, 2022. This means that the revised, broader description will apply to exports made from that date onwards.

Notification Details

Notification No. 06/2026-27

Date: 09/04/2026

Read More: Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed Over Pre-Deposit Shortfall Without Opportunity To Respond: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has set aside an order dismissing a cotton trader’s GST...

GST ITC Dispute: Dept. Asked To Produce Supplier’s Returns Or Explain Basis For Alleging Non-Payment Of Tax: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Prayagraj, has directed...

GST Interest Refund Disputes Involving Identical Legal Issue To Be Heard Together By Principal Bench: GSTAT

The Principal Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has allowed...

GST Refund Recovery Limitation Dispute Must Be Examined In Statutory Appeal; Supreme Court Declines Interference

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with a Delhi High Court order directing...

More like this

GST Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed Over Pre-Deposit Shortfall Without Opportunity To Respond: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has set aside an order dismissing a cotton trader’s GST...

GST ITC Dispute: Dept. Asked To Produce Supplier’s Returns Or Explain Basis For Alleging Non-Payment Of Tax: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Prayagraj, has directed...

GST Interest Refund Disputes Involving Identical Legal Issue To Be Heard Together By Principal Bench: GSTAT

The Principal Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has allowed...