HomeNotificationGSTN Issues Advisory On Reporting Values In Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B

GSTN Issues Advisory On Reporting Values In Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has notified the advisory on reporting values in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B.

Table 3.2 of Form GSTR-3B captures the inter-state supplies made to unregistered persons, composition taxpayers, and UIN holders out of the supplies declared in Table 3.1 & 3.1.1 of GSTR-3B. The values in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B auto-populates from corresponding inter-state supplies declared in GSTR-1, GSTR-1A, and IFF in requisite tables.

It is to inform you that from April-2025 tax period, inter-state supplies auto-populated in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B will be made non-editable. The GSTR-3B shall be filed with the auto-populated values as generated by the system only.

Therefore, in case any modification/amendment is required in auto-populated values of Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B, same can be done only by amending the corresponding values in respective tables of GSTR-1A or through Form GSTR-1/IFF filed for subsequent tax periods.

To ensure that GSTR-3B is filed accurately with the correct values of inter-state supplies, it is advised to report the correct values in GSTR-1, GSTR-1A, or IFF. This will ensure the auto-populated values in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B are accurate and compliant with GST regulations.

FAQ’s

1. What are the changes related to reporting supplies in Table 3.2?

Starting from the April 2025 tax period, the auto-populated values in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B for inter-state supplies made to unregistered persons, composition taxpayers, and UIN holders will be non-editable, and taxpayers will need to file GSTR-3B with the auto-populated values generated by the system only.

2. How can I rectify values in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B if incorrect values have been auto-populated after April 2025 period onwards due to incorrect reporting of the same through GSTR-1?

If incorrect values are auto-populated in Table 3.2 after April 2025, taxpayers need to correct the values by making amendments through Form GSTR-1A or through Form GSTR-1/IFF filed for subsequent tax periods. 

3. What should I do to ensure accurate reporting in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B?

Taxpayers should ensure that the inter-state supplies are reported correctly in their GSTR-1, GSTR-1A, or IFF. This will ensure that the accurate values are auto-populated in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B.

4. Till what time/date I can amend values furnished in GSTR-1 through Form GSTR-1A?

As there is no cut-off date for filing Form GSTR-1A before GSTR-3B which means Form GSTR-1A can be filed after filing Form GSTR-1 and till the time of filing Form GSTR-3B. Hence, any amendment required in auto-populated values of table 3.2, same can be carried out through Form GSTR-1A till the moment of filing GSTR-3B.

Click Here To Read Advisory

Read More: GSTN Issues Advisory on Table-12 of GSTR-1 or GSTR-1A

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Mere ‘Kitting’ of Imported Photocopier Modules Is Not ‘Manufacture’: Supreme Court Quashes Excise Duty Demand

The Supreme Court has held that merely grouping, plugging, pinning and configuring imported photocopier...

Proforma Invoice Valid for Availing CENVAT Credit if Service Tax Is Paid: CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Tax Demand Can’t Be Raised Through Computation Sheet When Assessment Accepts Returned Income Without Additions: ITAT

The Bengaluru Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...

Import Duty Payable on Actual Reduced Price Despite Higher Price at Time of Import: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Mere ‘Kitting’ of Imported Photocopier Modules Is Not ‘Manufacture’: Supreme Court Quashes Excise Duty Demand

The Supreme Court has held that merely grouping, plugging, pinning and configuring imported photocopier...

Proforma Invoice Valid for Availing CENVAT Credit if Service Tax Is Paid: CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Tax Demand Can’t Be Raised Through Computation Sheet When Assessment Accepts Returned Income Without Additions: ITAT

The Bengaluru Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...