Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationGovt Withdraws Polo Horse Import Duty Exemption One Day After Granting It

Govt Withdraws Polo Horse Import Duty Exemption One Day After Granting It

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a surprising turn of events, the Central Government has rolled back a customs duty exemption it had granted just a day earlier for the import of horses meant for polo. The decision comes through Notification No. 34/2025-Customs, issued by the Ministry of Finance on July 19, 2025, which omits Serial No. 10A from an earlier customs notification that had provided the exemption.

On July 18, 2025, via Notification No. 33/2025-Customs, the government had amended Notification No. 146/94-Customsto include duty-free import provisions specifically for polo horses. The exemption was applicable to:

  • Polo teams of the Indian Army and Navy,
  • Central Armed Police Forces’ teams,
  • Civilian teams participating in the Indian National Championship (14 Goals) or similar events recognized by the Indian Polo Association (IPA), and
  • Qualified individual players affiliated with the IPA.

Under the conditions, teams could import up to 30 horses every two years, and individuals up to six horses every three years. However, the benefit was contingent on a certificate issued by a Deputy Secretary or above in the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, detailing the importer’s credentials and compliance with quantity and licensing limits.

But barely 24 hours later, Notification No. 34/2025-Customs struck down these provisions altogether. The amendment deleted Serial No. 10A from the earlier table, effectively rescinding the concession.

No official statement has been issued yet explaining the abrupt policy reversal. However, policy watchers speculate that the rollback may have stemmed from concerns over misuse, regulatory oversight, or broader trade policy implications.

This sudden policy flip underscores the dynamic and sometimes unpredictable nature of India’s trade and customs regulation environment. Stakeholders in the polo community and import sector will now have to recalibrate their strategies following the cancellation of what could have been a game-changing concession.

Notification Details

Notification No.  34/2025-Customs

Date:  19th July, 2025

Read More: Money Laundering Red Flags: Key Indicators

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Penalty U/s 122(1A) Can’t Apply to Pre-2021 Transactions; Unregistered Beneficiaries Also Covered: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that personal penalties under Section 122(1A) of the...

One-Line Rejection Of Audit Reply Alone No Ground To Quash GST SCN: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has declined to interfere with a GST show cause notice...

Missing E-Invoice Alone Can’t Justify Rs. 63.72 Lakh GST Penalty Without Evidence of Tax Evasion: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow, has set aside an appellate...

E-Way Bill Generated After Vehicle Interception Can’t Cure Violation: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Varanasi, has upheld...

More like this

GST Penalty U/s 122(1A) Can’t Apply to Pre-2021 Transactions; Unregistered Beneficiaries Also Covered: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that personal penalties under Section 122(1A) of the...

One-Line Rejection Of Audit Reply Alone No Ground To Quash GST SCN: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has declined to interfere with a GST show cause notice...

Missing E-Invoice Alone Can’t Justify Rs. 63.72 Lakh GST Penalty Without Evidence of Tax Evasion: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow, has set aside an appellate...