Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationTweet On Tweet: Former Infosys CFO To FM On Her Response To...

Tweet On Tweet: Former Infosys CFO To FM On Her Response To Corruption [READ TWEET]

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A heated exchange on social media between prominent entrepreneur and former Infosys CFO T.V. Mohandas Pai and Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has sparked renewed public debate over corruption and inefficiencies in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) system.

Mohandas Pai took to X (formerly Twitter) to issue a strongly-worded appeal to Finance Minister Sitharaman, urging her to listen directly to citizens struggling with the GST registration and compliance process. Pai alleged a rise in corruption, long delays, and bribe-seeking behavior within the system, warning that citizens are “very, very scared to complain” due to fear of retaliation and lack of protection.

“You are our representative as MP and Minister,” Pai wrote, adding, “Our PM @narendramodi promised us a no corruption govt. and you must ensure that this is upheld.”

In response, Sitharaman reiterated the government’s commitment to transparency and taxpayer service. She shared a statement from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), saying, “To provide service to the taxpayer is our duty. While serving the taxpayers, transparency and integrity are crucial in earning their trust and confidence.”

She expressed confidence that both the CBIC and its field formations would continue to act with “sensitivity and responsiveness.”

Pai, however, remained critical of systemic issues, urging the Finance Minister to go beyond official narratives and engage directly with citizens who face day-to-day struggles under the GST regime. “Officials are getting more and more powers for rent seeking,” he warned, rejecting what he saw as efforts to shift blame to state governments or a dishonest minority.

The exchange has ignited significant public discussion online, with many echoing Pai’s concerns over bureaucratic hurdles and alleged corruption in GST administration.

Observers note that with general elections looming and public dissatisfaction over compliance processes growing, the government may face increasing pressure to streamline GST services and enforce stricter accountability.

Read More: GST DRC-01 Is Not A Substitute To Show Cause Notice Issued U/S 73 (1): Gauhati High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GSTAT Dismisses Dept. Appeal Over Rs. 7.35 Lakh Interest Demand as Below Rs. 20 Lakh Monetary Limit

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has dismissed a Revenue...

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Questioning ITC Eligibility Without S. 73 or 74 Proceedings: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has held that a...

Education Provider Need Not Be University to Claim Service Tax Exemption for Recognised Degree Courses: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Subsequent Deposit of Full 10% Meets Mandatory Pre-Deposit Requirement: CESTAT

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)...

More like this

GSTAT Dismisses Dept. Appeal Over Rs. 7.35 Lakh Interest Demand as Below Rs. 20 Lakh Monetary Limit

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has dismissed a Revenue...

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Questioning ITC Eligibility Without S. 73 or 74 Proceedings: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has held that a...

Education Provider Need Not Be University to Claim Service Tax Exemption for Recognised Degree Courses: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...