Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationFinance Act, 2026 Enacted: Revised Income Thresholds, Surcharge Structure To Be Effective...

Finance Act, 2026 Enacted: Revised Income Thresholds, Surcharge Structure To Be Effective From April 1

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Government has officially enacted the Finance Act, 2026 (No. 4 of 2026), following Presidential assent on March 30, 2026. The legislation gives effect to the Union Government’s financial proposals for the financial year 2026–27 and introduces significant provisions relating to income-tax rates, surcharge structures, and the continued evolution of the new tax regime. 

The Act comes into force largely from April 1, 2026, marking the beginning of the new assessment year and tax year under both the existing Income-tax Act, 1961 and the newly introduced Income-tax Act, 2025 framework. 

Revised Income Tax Thresholds and Continuity of New Tax Regime

One of the key highlights of the Finance Act, 2026 is the continuation and reinforcement of the concessional tax regime under section 115BAC(1A). The law prescribes that individuals opting for the new tax regime will enjoy a higher basic exemption limit of ₹4,00,000, compared to ₹2,50,000 for regular taxpayers. Senior citizens continue to benefit from higher exemption thresholds of ₹3,00,000 and ₹5,00,000 depending on age. 

The Act also retains the concept of aggregating agricultural income with total income for rate purposes where such agricultural income exceeds ₹5,000, ensuring continuity in tax computation methodology.

Surcharge Structure: Steep Gradation for High-Income Earners

The Finance Act, 2026 maintains a progressive surcharge structure, particularly impacting high-income individuals and entities. For individuals and similar taxpayers not opting for the new regime, surcharge rates range from 10% to a maximum of 37% for income exceeding ₹5 crore. 

However, in line with recent policy trends, surcharge on certain categories such as dividend income and capital gains is capped at 15% in specified cases, especially under the concessional tax regime, offering relief to investors. 

Domestic companies and cooperative societies also continue to face tiered surcharge rates, generally capped at 7% and 12% depending on income levels, while foreign companies are subject to lower surcharge rates of 2% and 5%. 

Health and Education Cess Retained

The Act continues the levy of Health and Education Cess at 4% on the aggregate of income-tax and surcharge. This remains unchanged and is intended to support government expenditure on public health and education infrastructure. 

Integration with Income-tax Act, 2025

A notable structural shift reflected in the Finance Act, 2026 is the simultaneous application of tax provisions under both the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the newly enacted Income-tax Act, 2025. The Act provides separate rate schedules and surcharge provisions under Part I-A and Part I-B of the First Schedule for both regimes, indicating a transitional phase in India’s direct tax system. 

Under the new Income-tax Act, 2025, similar exemption limits and surcharge structures have been prescribed, ensuring consistency and a smoother transition for taxpayers migrating to the new code.

Read More: GST Order Passed Before Scheduled Hearing Date Violates Natural Justice: Bombay High Court Quashes Ex Parte Assessment

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

S. 129(3) 7 Day Limit Mandatory For Passing Penalty Order: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has held that the...

Delayed S. 129(3) Order Void Ab Initio: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has allowed an appeal...

Clerical Error in GSTR-3B Can’t Deny Refund of Excess IGST Paid on Exports:  GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram Bench, has held that a...

Value of Principal’s Goods Not to Be Included in E-Way Bill on Return from Job Work: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram Bench, has held that when...

More like this

S. 129(3) 7 Day Limit Mandatory For Passing Penalty Order: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has held that the...

Delayed S. 129(3) Order Void Ab Initio: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has allowed an appeal...

Clerical Error in GSTR-3B Can’t Deny Refund of Excess IGST Paid on Exports:  GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram Bench, has held that a...