HomeNotificationFake Ministry of Finance Order on Fuel Price Hike Circulates Online

Fake Ministry of Finance Order on Fuel Price Hike Circulates Online

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A purported government order claiming a sharp hike in petrol and diesel prices recently went viral on social media, prompting swift clarification from the Ministry of Finance, which categorically termed the document as “fake” and misleading.

The viral document, falsely attributed to the Ministry of Finance, suggested that the Central Government had increased the price of petrol by ₹10 per litre and diesel by ₹12.50 per litre through a notification dated April 29, 2026. The fake order was widely shared across social media platforms, with several users amplifying the claim and attributing it to official government action.

The misinformation gained further traction after being circulated alongside a social media post alleging that the government had “brazenly” increased fuel prices during an ongoing election period. The post included what appeared to be an official notification bearing the emblem of the Government of India and formatting similar to genuine circulars issued by the Department of Revenue.

However, the Ministry of Finance promptly intervened and issued a public clarification, warning citizens that no such notification had been issued. The Ministry categorically stated that the document in circulation was fabricated and urged the public not to fall prey to misinformation.

Officials highlighted that the fake notification misused official formatting and references to statutory provisions, including mentions of the Finance Act, 2002 and excise duty adjustments, in an attempt to lend credibility to the fabricated content. The forged document also falsely cited a notification number and carried a fabricated signature, further indicating deliberate attempts to mislead the public.

Buy Now: 500+ CGST Notifications (2017–2025) | Clickable Index E-Magazine | Hyperlinked Original PDFs

Government sources emphasized that any changes in fuel pricing or excise duties are communicated through official channels, including the Gazette of India and verified government websites. Citizens were advised to rely only on authenticated sources for such sensitive information and to verify claims before sharing them on social media.

The incident underscores the growing challenge of misinformation in the digital age, particularly involving forged government documents that can influence public perception and trigger unwarranted panic or political reactions. Authorities have indicated that necessary steps may be taken to trace the origin of the fake document and curb further dissemination.

The Ministry reiterated its appeal to the public to remain vigilant and report suspicious or unverified content, especially when it pertains to government policies or financial decisions.

Read More: DGGI Raipur | Anticipatory Bail Denied In Rs. 27 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case, Chhattisgarh High Court Calls It “Organised Economic Offence”

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Penalty U/s 26 of Central Excise Rules Unsustainable Without Finding on Confiscation: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

Income Tax Disclosures in Election Affidavit Can’t Be Examined via Writ: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has dismissed a writ petition seeking verification of a candidate’s...

S. 80HHC Deduction Can’t Be Reduced by Prior S. 80IA Deduction: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has held that deduction under Section 80HHC cannot be computed...

Madras High Court Upholds Penalty for Suppression of Facts Despite Pre-SCN Duty Payment in CENVAT Credit Case

The Madras High Court has upheld the imposition of penalty on Balamurugan Chemicals Pvt....

More like this

Penalty U/s 26 of Central Excise Rules Unsustainable Without Finding on Confiscation: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

Income Tax Disclosures in Election Affidavit Can’t Be Examined via Writ: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has dismissed a writ petition seeking verification of a candidate’s...

S. 80HHC Deduction Can’t Be Reduced by Prior S. 80IA Deduction: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has held that deduction under Section 80HHC cannot be computed...