HomeNotificationCBIC Clarifies Drawback Eligibility on Re-Export of Duty Paid Goods Supplied From...

CBIC Clarifies Drawback Eligibility on Re-Export of Duty Paid Goods Supplied From SEZ to DTA

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that goods supplied by a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) unit to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) on payment of applicable customs duties, and subsequently re-exported, shall be treated as “imported goods” for the purpose of claiming drawback under Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962. 

The clarification has been issued through Instruction No. 06/2026-Customs dated 27 April 2026 by the Drawback Division of CBIC following objections raised in Audit Report No. 33 of 2025 regarding inconsistent practices by field formations. 

According to the Board, the audit had observed that divergent practices were being followed while processing drawback claims filed by DTA units under Section 74 of the Customs Act. In several cases, customs formations denied drawback benefits by taking the view that clearance of goods from an SEZ to the DTA could not be treated as an “import.” 

Examining the issue, CBIC referred to Section 30 of the SEZ Act, 2005, which provides that removal of goods from an SEZ into the DTA attracts customs duties, including anti-dumping duty, countervailing duty, and safeguard duty, as applicable under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Board noted that the applicable rate of duty and tariff valuation would be the rate and valuation in force on the date of removal from the SEZ. 

The Board further referred to Section 2(o) of the SEZ Act, 2005, which defines “import” in relation to SEZ operations. CBIC observed that, for trade operations and duty purposes, an SEZ is treated as foreign territory within India. Consequently, movement of goods from an SEZ into the DTA may be construed as an import. 

CBIC also analysed Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962, which permits drawback on re-export of duty-paid goods that were previously imported into India and are capable of being easily identified. The Board stated that the conditions under Section 74 appear to be fulfilled in such transactions because the goods entering DTA from SEZ are effectively treated as imported goods and are duty paid. 

Clarifying the legal position, the instruction categorically states that where goods are cleared into the DTA from an SEZ unit on payment of applicable duties and are later re-exported, such goods shall be treated as imported goods for the purposes of disbursement of drawback under Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962. 

The clarification is expected to bring uniformity in processing drawback claims across customs field formations and resolve disputes arising from denial of drawback benefits in re-export cases involving SEZ-origin goods. It may also provide significant relief to DTA units engaged in international trade operations where goods sourced from SEZs are subsequently exported out of India.

Notification Details

Instruction No. 06/2026-Customs

Date: 27/04/2026

Read More: Supreme Court Refuses To Recognise Title Over Forest Land Based Solely On Revenue Entries

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 20 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 20, 2026.GSTGHAZIABAD DGGI | MEERUT COURT...

Allahabad High Court Judge Challenges CBDT’s Denial of Section 22D Tax Exemption Under New Tax Regime

A sitting judge of the Allahabad High Court, Justice Sandeep Jain, has approached the...

Block Assessment Can’t Be Based on Post-Search Investigation: Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 21 Crore Tax Addition

The Delhi High Court has quashed the Rs. 21 Crore Tax Addition and held...

Insurer Liable for Nepal Accident Despite No Extra Premium: Supreme Court Says Valid Permit Extends Motor Insurance Coverage

The Supreme Court has held that an insurance company cannot deny liability for a...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 20 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 20, 2026.GSTGHAZIABAD DGGI | MEERUT COURT...

Allahabad High Court Judge Challenges CBDT’s Denial of Section 22D Tax Exemption Under New Tax Regime

A sitting judge of the Allahabad High Court, Justice Sandeep Jain, has approached the...

Block Assessment Can’t Be Based on Post-Search Investigation: Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 21 Crore Tax Addition

The Delhi High Court has quashed the Rs. 21 Crore Tax Addition and held...