HomeNotificationDGFT Prohibits Import of Areca Nuts Below Rs. 351 Per Kg

DGFT Prohibits Import of Areca Nuts Below Rs. 351 Per Kg

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has prohibited import of areca nuts below Rs. 351 per kg.

The notification has amended the import policy and policy conditions for Areca Nuts falling under ITC (HS) Codes 08028090 and 20081991 of the ITC (HS) 2022 Schedule-I (Import Policy).

According to the new directive, the import of Areca Nuts with a CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) value below ₹351 per kilogram is now prohibited. However, imports priced at or above ₹351 per kilogram will remain free.

The DGFT further clarified that this minimum import price condition will not apply to 100% Export-Oriented Units (EOUs), Special Economic Zone (SEZ) units, and Imports under the Advance Authorization Scheme.

The policy change also extends to roasted Areca Nuts under ITC (HS) Code 20081991. Imports of roasted areca nuts valued below ₹351/kg are similarly prohibited, while all other roasted nuts and seeds remain freely importable.

Notification Details

Notification No. 43 /2025-26

Date: 15/10/2025

Read More: Orissa HC Grants Bail To Person Accused Of Wrongfully Availing ITC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Whether Dept. Can Invoke S. 73 Without Challenging Refund Sanction Order? Telangana High Court Stays GST Refund Recovery 

The Telangana High Court has raised a significant jurisdictional question under the Goods and...

S. 56(2)(x) Can’t Tax Redevelopment Flats Before Possession; Registration of Agreement Alone Doesn’t Amount to ‘Receipt’: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that Section...

CBDT Circular Can’t Override Jurisdictional Defect: ITAT Refuses to Recall Low Tax Effect Dismissal

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed the Income...

Inadvertent Omission in Form 3CD Due to Software Error Can’t Attract Penalty Under S. 271B: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

More like this

Whether Dept. Can Invoke S. 73 Without Challenging Refund Sanction Order? Telangana High Court Stays GST Refund Recovery 

The Telangana High Court has raised a significant jurisdictional question under the Goods and...

S. 56(2)(x) Can’t Tax Redevelopment Flats Before Possession; Registration of Agreement Alone Doesn’t Amount to ‘Receipt’: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that Section...

CBDT Circular Can’t Override Jurisdictional Defect: ITAT Refuses to Recall Low Tax Effect Dismissal

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed the Income...