Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationDGFT Prohibits Export of Raw Human Hair Below $65/kg to Curb Misuse

DGFT Prohibits Export of Raw Human Hair Below $65/kg to Curb Misuse

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has issued a major amendment to its export policy concerning raw human hair, aimed at tightening controls and ensuring fair trade practices.

As per the latest notification, the export of raw, unworked human hair—whether washed or not—has been shifted from the “Restricted” category to “Prohibited.”

However, to support legitimate high-value trade, the government has introduced a conditional exemption: if the Free on Board (FOB) value of the consignment is USD 65 or more per kilogram, the export will be considered “Free,” meaning it can proceed without special permissions.

This revised policy, which takes immediate effect, targets rampant undervaluation and unauthorized exports in the human hair trade, a commodity with significant global demand, particularly in the beauty and fashion industries.

By setting a minimum value threshold for free exports, the government aims to deter fraudulent practices such as under-invoicing, which has been a persistent issue in the sector.

The policy change is expected to enhance transparency, promote genuine trade, and safeguard domestic interests by preventing the outflow of valuable raw material at suppressed prices.

Notification Details

Notification No. 59/2024-25

Date: 10th February, 2025

Click Here To Read Notification

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Refund After Successful Appeal | 6% Interest Runs From 60 Days After Original Application: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Andhra Pradesh State Bench at Vijayawada,...

GSTR-2A Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrong ITC Claim: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad, has substantially reduced an input...

GST Dept. Can’t Use S. 73 To Recover Pre-GST CENVAT Credit On Eligibility Grounds: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that proceedings...

GST Audit Detection Alone Doesn’t Prove Wilful Suppression: GSTAT Quashes S. 74 Proceedings

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that a...

More like this

GST Refund After Successful Appeal | 6% Interest Runs From 60 Days After Original Application: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Andhra Pradesh State Bench at Vijayawada,...

GSTR-2A Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrong ITC Claim: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad, has substantially reduced an input...

GST Dept. Can’t Use S. 73 To Recover Pre-GST CENVAT Credit On Eligibility Grounds: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that proceedings...