Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationDGFT Implements NPCI-Based Bank Account Validation for IEC Applications From February 2026

DGFT Implements NPCI-Based Bank Account Validation for IEC Applications From February 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has implemented an NPCI-based real-time bank account validation system for Importer Exporter Code (IEC) issuance and modification, effective February 2026, as per Trade Notice No. 23/2025-26.

The move follows DGFT’s earlier digitisation initiative introduced via Public Notice No. 32/2025-26 dated November 20, 2025, which enabled API-based verification of IEC-related details using authenticated government databases. The latest integration with the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) further deepens this digital verification framework.

Objective: Ensuring Authentic IEC-Linked Bank Accounts

The NPCI integration aims to ensure that bank accounts linked with IECs are genuine, correctly mapped, and traceable, thereby reducing misuse, benami transactions, and errors in trade documentation. With this, DGFT seeks to establish a fully digital, automatic, and trusted trade facilitation system.

Under the revised workflow, real-time validation of bank account details will be carried out at the time of issuance of a new IEC, and modification of existing IEC details.

Mandatory Disclosure of All PAN-Linked Bank Accounts

As per the Trade Notice, applicants are now required to declare all active bank accounts linked with their PAN, and ensure that the PAN, applicant name, and bank account details exactly match bank records.

Any mismatch between these particulars may result in delays, deficiencies, or rejection of the application.

NPCI Validation Status and System Actions

Once bank details are submitted, they are transmitted to NPCI for validation. The system may return one of the following statuses: “Success,” “In Progress,” or “Failed.” DGFT has clearly defined the consequences of each status based on the type of application.

For new IEC applications, if all bank accounts receive a “Success” status, the application proceeds normally. If the status remains “In Progress” without any failure, the application is placed under automatic review and is auto-approved upon successful validation. However, if validation ultimately fails, the application is rejected. Where validation fails at the outset for any bank account, the application cannot be submitted until corrected details are provided.

For IEC modification requests, a similar approach applies. Applications with “In Progress” status are placed under automatic review and approved once validation succeeds. If validation fails for the first time, the application is marked “Deficient,” allowing the exporter or importer to correct the bank details and respond. Any subsequent failure leads to rejection. Modification applications with immediate validation failure cannot be submitted unless bank details are rectified.

DGFT has also clarified that in cases where validation is “In Progress,” the system will periodically fetch updated validation status from NPCI.

Advisory to Exporters, Importers, and Banks

DGFT has strongly advised all stakeholders—including exporters, importers, banks, financial institutions, export promotion councils, and commodity boards—to verify bank details, PAN linkage, and name matching before submitting IEC applications or modification requests.

Any technical difficulties or issues in submission or update may be reported through the DGFT Helpdesk.

Read More: Final Orders Can’t Be Reopened in Writ Jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Entertain Delayed Challenge to Customs Demand

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...