Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationDelhi High Court Dispenses with 'Gown' Requirement for Advocates 

Delhi High Court Dispenses with ‘Gown’ Requirement for Advocates 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has dispensed with the ‘Gown’ requirement for advocates.

In a significant relaxation of courtroom dress code norms, the Delhi High Court has officially dispensed with the mandatory wearing of the traditional ‘Gown’ by advocates practicing before the court. This change, effective from Monday, March 17, 2025, supersedes the earlier notice No. 2533/G-11/Genl.-II/DHC/2024 dated October 21, 2024.

The dispensation of gown by Delhi High Court is seasonal and a routine affair.

Read More: Gold Smuggling Accused Granted Bail by Mumbai Court Citing ‘Inadequate Arrest’

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Paver That Reaches 9 Metres Only With Bolt-On Extensions Can’t Claim Customs Duty Exemption: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai upheld the denial of...

GSTAT Launches First E-Journal [DOWNLOAD NOW]

The inaugural volume brings together 20 GST appeal decisions and seven anti-profiteering matters. Its...

Surgical Tools Used in Spinal Operations Fall Under Customs Heading 9018, Not Orthopaedic Appliances Heading 9021: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench upheld the reclassification of imported surgical instruments and rejected the importer’s...

Disposable Microcuvettes Designed for Diagnostic Analyser Are Machine Parts, Not Plastic Articles: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Paver That Reaches 9 Metres Only With Bolt-On Extensions Can’t Claim Customs Duty Exemption: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai upheld the denial of...

GSTAT Launches First E-Journal [DOWNLOAD NOW]

The inaugural volume brings together 20 GST appeal decisions and seven anti-profiteering matters. Its...

Surgical Tools Used in Spinal Operations Fall Under Customs Heading 9018, Not Orthopaedic Appliances Heading 9021: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench upheld the reclassification of imported surgical instruments and rejected the importer’s...