Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationDelhi High Court Dispenses with 'Gown' Requirement for Advocates 

Delhi High Court Dispenses with ‘Gown’ Requirement for Advocates 

Notification

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Delhi High Court Dispenses with 'Gown' Requirement for Advocates

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has dispensed with the ‘Gown’ requirement for advocates.

In a significant relaxation of courtroom dress code norms, the Delhi High Court has officially dispensed with the mandatory wearing of the traditional ‘Gown’ by advocates practicing before the court. This change, effective from Monday, March 17, 2025, supersedes the earlier notice No. 2533/G-11/Genl.-II/DHC/2024 dated October 21, 2024.

The dispensation of gown by Delhi High Court is seasonal and a routine affair.

Click Here To Read Notification

Read More: Gold Smuggling Accused Granted Bail by Mumbai Court Citing ‘Inadequate Arrest’

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GSTR-1 Duplication Can’t Create Tax Liability Without Second Supply: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...
GST

GST Demand Can’t Be Confirmed Without SCN; DRC-01 Summary No Substitute: GSTAT Bengaluru

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...
GST

SUV Ground Clearance Must Be Measured In Laden Condition For Pre-July 26, 2023 Supplies: GSTAT Quashes ₹9.76 Crore Cess Demand

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that ground...
Notification

CBIC Clarifies Rule 96(10) Omission Applies Retrospectively From October 23, 2017

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that the omission...

More like this

GST

GSTR-1 Duplication Can’t Create Tax Liability Without Second Supply: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...
GST

GST Demand Can’t Be Confirmed Without SCN; DRC-01 Summary No Substitute: GSTAT Bengaluru

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...
GST

SUV Ground Clearance Must Be Measured In Laden Condition For Pre-July 26, 2023 Supplies: GSTAT Quashes ₹9.76 Crore Cess Demand

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that ground...