HomeNotificationAppeals Deemed Withdrawn For Demands from July 2017 to March 2020 Under...

Appeals Deemed Withdrawn For Demands from July 2017 to March 2020 Under GST Amnesty Scheme: CBIC 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified that the Central Goods and Services Tax (Second Amendment) Rules, 2025 to further amend the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017.

1. Changes to Rule 164 (Sub-rule 4)

The amendment clarifieD that payments made towards tax, interest, and penalties before the commencement of these rules will not be eligible for a refund.

If a demand notice under Section 128A(1) of the CGST Act includes tax dues for both the period covered under the said sub-section and another period, then the tax discharged earlier cannot be refunded.

2. Amendments in Rule 164 (Sub-rule 7)

A new proviso has been added allowing taxpayers to limit their appeal to only a part of the demand notice.

If a demand notice under Section 128A(1) includes tax dues for multiple periods, taxpayers can inform the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal that they will not pursue an appeal for the period covered in Section 128A(1).

The appellate authority, upon receiving such a request, will issue an order for the tax liability related to the remaining period as deemed fit.

3. Clarity on Appeal Withdrawal

A specific explanation clarifies that appeals shall be considered withdrawn for demands related to the period from July 1, 2017, to March 31, 2020, under sub-clause (3) of Section 128A.

Notification Details

Notification No. 11/2025–Central Tax 

Date: 27th March, 2025.

Read More: GST Amnesty Scheme: CBIC Issues Clarification On Availment Of Section 128A Benefit

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Poultry Cage Weld Mesh

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Commission Retained on Air Tickets Bought Through GSA/IATA Agents Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Duty-Paid Inputs from Area-Based Exempt Units: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Ignoring Taxpayer’s Reply While Rejecting GST Refund Is Illegal: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has set aside an ex-parte order rejecting a GST refund...

More like this

CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Poultry Cage Weld Mesh

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Commission Retained on Air Tickets Bought Through GSA/IATA Agents Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Duty-Paid Inputs from Area-Based Exempt Units: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...