Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationAppeals Deemed Withdrawn For Demands from July 2017 to March 2020 Under...

Appeals Deemed Withdrawn For Demands from July 2017 to March 2020 Under GST Amnesty Scheme: CBIC 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified that the Central Goods and Services Tax (Second Amendment) Rules, 2025 to further amend the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017.

1. Changes to Rule 164 (Sub-rule 4)

The amendment clarifieD that payments made towards tax, interest, and penalties before the commencement of these rules will not be eligible for a refund.

If a demand notice under Section 128A(1) of the CGST Act includes tax dues for both the period covered under the said sub-section and another period, then the tax discharged earlier cannot be refunded.

2. Amendments in Rule 164 (Sub-rule 7)

A new proviso has been added allowing taxpayers to limit their appeal to only a part of the demand notice.

If a demand notice under Section 128A(1) includes tax dues for multiple periods, taxpayers can inform the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal that they will not pursue an appeal for the period covered in Section 128A(1).

The appellate authority, upon receiving such a request, will issue an order for the tax liability related to the remaining period as deemed fit.

3. Clarity on Appeal Withdrawal

A specific explanation clarifies that appeals shall be considered withdrawn for demands related to the period from July 1, 2017, to March 31, 2020, under sub-clause (3) of Section 128A.

Notification Details

Notification No. 11/2025–Central Tax 

Date: 27th March, 2025.

Read More: GST Amnesty Scheme: CBIC Issues Clarification On Availment Of Section 128A Benefit

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...