HomeNotificationCBIC Appoints Common Adjudicating Authority for Bando India Pvt Ltd Customs Cases

CBIC Appoints Common Adjudicating Authority for Bando India Pvt Ltd Customs Cases

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has appointed a Common Adjudicating Authority to handle multiple show cause notices issued to Bando (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company located in Gurugram, Haryana. 

The CBIC, exercising powers under Section 4 and related provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, has designated the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai-II (Import), as the Common Adjudicating Authority. This official will oversee and adjudicate a set of four distinct show cause notices originally under the jurisdiction of various customs officers across India.

Details of the Notices:

Notice No.DateOriginal Authority
511/202421.05.2024Deputy Commissioner, Import Assessment, ICD Whitefield, Bengaluru
253/2021-2216.03.2022Assistant Commissioner, ACC-Import, New Delhi
07/202401.02.2024Deputy Commissioner, Gr-II, Chennai-II (Import)
248/202405.03.2024Deputy Commissioner (PAG), AP & ACC, Bengaluru

Notification Details

Notification No. 41/2025-Customs (N.T.)

Date: 11/06/2025

Read More: GST | Final Tax, Interest, Penalty Can’t Be More Than Amount Mentioned In SCN: Allahabad High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

State Can’t Unilaterally Decide Breach and Bar Legal Remedies: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award

The Supreme Court has held that a State authority cannot unilaterally determine breach of...

Developments in Parallel Proceedings—Such as Insolvency Resolutions or OTS Approvals—Can’t Be Used to Reopen Concluded SLP: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that subsequent developments in parallel proceedings, including insolvency resolutions...

No Right to Appointment from Unfilled Vacancy Due to Non-Joining: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that a candidate cannot claim appointment to a government...

Relaxation in TET Doesn’t Bar Reserved Candidates from Open Category Selection Based on Merit: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that candidates belonging to reserved categories who avail relaxation...

More like this

State Can’t Unilaterally Decide Breach and Bar Legal Remedies: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award

The Supreme Court has held that a State authority cannot unilaterally determine breach of...

Developments in Parallel Proceedings—Such as Insolvency Resolutions or OTS Approvals—Can’t Be Used to Reopen Concluded SLP: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that subsequent developments in parallel proceedings, including insolvency resolutions...

No Right to Appointment from Unfilled Vacancy Due to Non-Joining: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that a candidate cannot claim appointment to a government...