Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesWhether Finance Act (No.2) 2024 Will Be Applicable On Reassessment Proceedings Initiated...

Whether Finance Act (No.2) 2024 Will Be Applicable On Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Prior To 01.09.2024? Allahabad High Court To Answer

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court will examine the issue whether Finance Act (No.2) 2024 will be applicable on reassessment proceedings initiated prior to 01.09.2024.

The bench of Justice Brij Raj Singh and Justice Rajan Roy has stayed the proceedings and asked the department to respond to the question as to how the proceedings under Section 148A(b) initiated prior to 01.09.2024, if at all, would be saved after coming into force of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 w.e.f. 01.09.2024 especially in view of Section 152(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which has been inserted by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024.

The petitioner contended that only such cases where notice under Section 148 had been issued or an order under clause (d) of sub-Section-148A had been issued prior to the 1 September, 2024 which is the date of coming into force of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 , the assessment, reassessment or recomputation in such case shall be governed as per the provisions of Sections 147 to 151, as they stood immediately before the commencement of Finance (No.2) Act, 2024.

In other words, if the eventualities are not satisfied then the earlier provisions be inoperative and will not apply and any action could be taken only under the substituted or new provisions which have come into effect from 01.09.2024 and as there is specific saving clause in the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, the contention is that Section 6 of General Clause Act, 1897 will not apply because the intention in the specific saving clause contained under the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 is different.

The court listed the matter on 16.01.2025.

Changes Under Reassessment Proceedings Vide Finance Act (No.2) 2024 

The Finance Bill, 2024 revamped the reassessment provisions with effect from 1 September 2024. The time limit for issue of notice for reassessment proceedings was proposed to be reduced from ten years to five years three months.

The amendments now provide that assessing officers can issue a notice for reassessment based on the information received under the notified scheme and hence tax officers can initiate reopening of proceedings based on the scheme notified for faceless collection of information.

In order to make the procedure of assessment of search cases cost effective and efficient, a new scheme of block assessment was introduced for search and seizure conducted on or after 1 September 2024. The block period7 would be six assessment years preceding the year in which the search was initiated or any requisition was made. As per the scheme, undisclosed income would be taxed at 60%.

The Finance Bill 2024 had included incorrect claims of any expenditure, deduction or allowance in the definition of undisclosed income. The definition of “undisclosed income” 10 has been expanded now. “Undisclosed income” would now include any exemption claimed by the taxpayer, which is found to be incorrect.

Read More: ICAI Notifies Online Eligibility Test For Post Qualification Course On 15 February 2025

Case Details

Case Title: Ravish Rastogi Versus UOI

Case No.: Writ Tax No. – 359 Of 2024

Date: 03.01.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Aakash Prasad, Himanshu Singh

Counsel For Respondent: A.S.G.I., Kushagra Dikshit

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CBIC Cuts EMI Scheme Paperwork From 10 Documents to 3 to Boost MSME Participation

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has substantially reduced the documentation...

PIL In Supreme Court Challenges MDR On UPI Payments Above Rs. 2,000; Stay Sought On October 15 Rollout

A Public Interest Litigation has been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the Centre’s...

Small Export Consignments Up To Rs. 3 Lakh Exempted From RCMC Requirement: DGFT

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has exempted low-value export consignments with a...

Brand Name Mentioned Only on Invoice Can’t Deny Excise Exemption: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that merely mentioning a brand name on sale...

More like this

CBIC Cuts EMI Scheme Paperwork From 10 Documents to 3 to Boost MSME Participation

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has substantially reduced the documentation...

PIL In Supreme Court Challenges MDR On UPI Payments Above Rs. 2,000; Stay Sought On October 15 Rollout

A Public Interest Litigation has been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the Centre’s...

Small Export Consignments Up To Rs. 3 Lakh Exempted From RCMC Requirement: DGFT

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has exempted low-value export consignments with a...