VoIP Phones with Video & Data Capabilities Classifiable under CTH 8517 62 90; IBM India Denied Customs Exemption: CESTAT

HomeIndirect TaxesVoIP Phones with Video & Data Capabilities Classifiable under CTH 8517 62...

VoIP Phones with Video & Data Capabilities Classifiable under CTH 8517 62 90; IBM India Denied Customs Exemption: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

24/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

VoIP Phones with Video & Data Capabilities Classifiable under CTH 8517 62 90; IBM India Denied Customs Exemption: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that advanced VoIP phones capable of transmitting voice, video, and data are not mere telephone sets but fall under the category of data transmission apparatus. The bench Dr. D.M. Misra (Judicial Member) and R. Bhagya Devi (Technical Member) upheld the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
VoIP Phones

VoIP Phones with Video & Data Capabilities Classifiable under CTH 8517 62 90; IBM India Denied Customs Exemption: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

Customs Valuation: CESTAT Quashes Export Value Enhancement for Violation of Natural Justice, Remands Matter

SEZ Units Entitled to Service Tax Refund on Input Services Used in Authorised Operations: CESTAT Chennai Allows Nokia India’s Appeal

Customs Penalty Unsustainable Without Evidence of Abetment: CESTAT Quashes Penalties U/s 112(a)

SEZ Units Entitled to Service Tax Refund Even on ‘Asterisk-Marked’ Services: CESTAT Quashes Denial for Lack of Evidence

More like this

Customs Valuation: CESTAT Quashes Export Value Enhancement for Violation of Natural Justice, Remands Matter

SEZ Units Entitled to Service Tax Refund on Input Services Used in Authorised Operations: CESTAT Chennai Allows Nokia India’s Appeal

Customs Penalty Unsustainable Without Evidence of Abetment: CESTAT Quashes Penalties U/s 112(a)

About us

Company

Categories