Transfer of Development Rights Is Not Taxable Service: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 4.48 Crore Service Tax Demand on Real Estate Developer

HomeIndirect TaxesTransfer of Development Rights Is Not Taxable Service: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 4.48...

Transfer of Development Rights Is Not Taxable Service: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 4.48 Crore Service Tax Demand on Real Estate Developer

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

30/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Transfer of Development Rights Is Not Taxable Service: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 448 Crore Service Tax Demand on Real Estate Developer

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a service tax demand of over Rs. 4.48 crore raised against a leading real estate developer, holding that the transfer of land development rights constitutes a transfer of immovable property and does not amount to a taxable service under…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Development Rights

Transfer of Development Rights Is Not Taxable Service: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 4.48 Crore Service Tax Demand on Real Estate Developer

Membership Required

Latest articles

Chhattisgarh High Court Denies Bail in GST Bribery Case Over Alleged Impersonation of Commissioner, Conspiracy to Demand Bribe

Whether Ledger Non-Handover By Junior Accountant Constitutes Criminal Breach Of Trust: Chhattisgarh High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Rs. 41.62 Lakh Hotel Case

Whether GST Registration Cancelled for Non-Filing of Returns Can Be Restored Under Rule 22(4) Proviso Despite Delay in Appeal? Gauhati High Court Answers

Delhi Customs | Rs. 5.51 Crore Gold, Luxury Watch Seizure: Court Grants 14 Day Judicial Custody

More like this

Chhattisgarh High Court Denies Bail in GST Bribery Case Over Alleged Impersonation of Commissioner, Conspiracy to Demand Bribe

Whether Ledger Non-Handover By Junior Accountant Constitutes Criminal Breach Of Trust: Chhattisgarh High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Rs. 41.62 Lakh Hotel Case

Whether GST Registration Cancelled for Non-Filing of Returns Can Be Restored Under Rule 22(4) Proviso Despite Delay in Appeal? Gauhati High Court Answers

About us

Company

Categories