Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDelhi High Court Denies Release of USD 24,500 In Tourist's Currency Seizure...

Delhi High Court Denies Release of USD 24,500 In Tourist’s Currency Seizure Case, Awaits Appeal Adjudication

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the release of USD 24,500 seized from a tourist at IGI Airport cannot be granted until the pending appeal is adjudicated. 

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Dharmesh Sharma has observed that since the clear instructions are that the Department has challenged the Order-in-Original dated 29th March, 2024, the Commissioner (Appeals) must now adjudicate the appeal in accordance with the law. Until such adjudication, the prayer for the release of the currency cannot be granted.

The petitioner/assessee arrived at IGI airport as a tourist and she was holding an Uzbekistan passport. The currency to the tune of USD 24,500/- was seized. 

Subsequently, a show cause notice was issued, and the Order-in-Original was passed, giving the Petitioner permission to redeem the goods upon payment of redemption fine and penalty.

ThePetitioner submitted that the amount is still not being released in spite of the Petitioner’s willingness to pay the redemption fine and the penalty.
The matter was listed and the Department was directed to take instructions as to whether any appeal has been filed challenging the said Order-in-Original or not.

The department submitted that an appeal has been preferred by the Respondent/Department and hence, the release would not be possible at this stage.

The petitioner has sought the release of the currency to the tune of USD 24,500/- which was seized by the Respondent/Department from the Petitioner.

The court held that in terms of Section 128A(4A), the Commissioner (Appeals) is to decide every appeal where it is possible to do so within a period of six months from the date when it has been filed. Accordingly, the Commissioner (Appeals)shall decide the appeal as per the provisions of the Act within a period of four months.

Case Details

Case Title: Dilaram Shamuratovna Versus Union Of India 

Case No.: W.P.(C) 1855/2025

Date: 14.02.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Ashish Panday

Counsel For Respondent: Shubham Tyagi

Read More: Mahendra Ranga, Principal Chief Commissioner of CGST Rajasthan, Passes Away – A Legacy of Distinguished Service

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred Where Delay Occurred Beyond Taxpayer’s Control: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has directed the GST Appellate Authority to entertain an appeal...

Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Trace Gutka Machinery Removed After DGGI Seizure: Punjab and Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused anticipatory bail to a person accused...

GST Dept. Cant Adjust Sanctioned Refund Against Interest Liability Without Demand Notice and Hearing: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has ruled that tax authorities cannot appropriate a sanctioned refund...

Dept. Can’t Apply Different Yardsticks in Identical Tax Cases: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 21.92 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a departmental appeal challenging the setting aside of...

More like this

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred Where Delay Occurred Beyond Taxpayer’s Control: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has directed the GST Appellate Authority to entertain an appeal...

Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Trace Gutka Machinery Removed After DGGI Seizure: Punjab and Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused anticipatory bail to a person accused...

GST Dept. Cant Adjust Sanctioned Refund Against Interest Liability Without Demand Notice and Hearing: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has ruled that tax authorities cannot appropriate a sanctioned refund...