Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesThird-Party Diaries Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Removal | CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand...

Third-Party Diaries Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Removal | CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Against Steel Manufacturer

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a substantial central excise duty demand, equivalent penalty on a steel manufacturer and a separate penalty of ₹3 crore imposed on its Director, holding that allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be sustained solely on the basis of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Direct Tax

Post-Search Assessment Under Wrong Provision Quashed: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed two assessments...
Direct Tax

Rs. 13.32 Crore Development Fee Collected by Educational Trust Treated as Corpus Receipt: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has upheld the treatment of ₹13.32 crore...
GST

GSTAT Admits Penalty Appeal Without 10% Pre-Deposit, Citing Date of SCN

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench held that the new...
Direct Tax

Survey Disclosure Alone Doesn’t Establish Misreporting: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted a penalty...

More like this

Direct Tax

Post-Search Assessment Under Wrong Provision Quashed: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed two assessments...
Direct Tax

Rs. 13.32 Crore Development Fee Collected by Educational Trust Treated as Corpus Receipt: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has upheld the treatment of ₹13.32 crore...
GST

GSTAT Admits Penalty Appeal Without 10% Pre-Deposit, Citing Date of SCN

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench held that the new...