Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesMadras High Court Stays Order Declaring Baggage Rules Provision Invalid; Halts Action...

Madras High Court Stays Order Declaring Baggage Rules Provision Invalid; Halts Action Against Customs Officers in Gold Thaali Seizure Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has stayed a single judge’s order that declared a provision of the Baggage Rules ultra vires to the Customs Act regarding jewellery worn on the person. The single judge had also directed disciplinary action against Air Customs officers who seized gold ornaments, including the nuptial thread (thaali) of a Sri Lankan national, at Chennai Airport.

A division bench comprising Justice S S Sundar and Justice C Saravanan passed the interim stay while hearing appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Customs, Chennai, challenging the single judge’s order dated January 31, 2025. The bench directed the Customs department to return the seized jewellery after obtaining appropriate security, bond, or personal guarantee from the passengers concerned.

The single judge had earlier ruled the seizure unlawful and instructed the Union government’s Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) to take action against the seizing officer for alleged excesses.

Read More: Customs Officer Forcefully Snatched Mangalsutra From Sri Lankan Citizen:  Madras High Court Directs Enquiry Against Customs Officers

During the hearing, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) A R L Sundaresan, along with senior standing counsel M Santhanaraman, argued that the single judge overlooked key legal aspects. They contended that under the Baggage Rules, 2016, used personal items do not include gold in any form.

“If this interpretation is accepted, unscrupulous passengers might exploit the law by wearing smuggled gold, thereby undermining efforts to regulate gold imports. Such a view would render the existing legal framework ineffective,” the ASG submitted.

The division bench’s interim order strikes a balance by ensuring the jewellery is returned while securing the government’s interest through necessary guarantees. The case has been adjourned for further hearing, with legal experts closely watching the outcome due to its potential implications for Customs enforcement across Indian airports.

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DGGI Gawahati | GST Bank Account Attachment Automatically Lapses After 1 Year: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that provisional attachment of bank accounts under Section...

S. 74 GST Can’t Be Invoked to Question CENVAT Credit Availed Under Pre-GST Regime: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that GST authorities cannot invoke Section...

Service Tax Order Passed 8.5 Years After SCN Quashed: Meghalaya High Court

The Meghalaya High Court has quashed a service tax adjudication order against the Assam...

DRI Busts International Gold-Smuggling Syndicate Operated By Chinese National

The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), Mumbai Zonal Unit, has busted an international gold-smuggling...

More like this

DGGI Gawahati | GST Bank Account Attachment Automatically Lapses After 1 Year: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that provisional attachment of bank accounts under Section...

S. 74 GST Can’t Be Invoked to Question CENVAT Credit Availed Under Pre-GST Regime: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that GST authorities cannot invoke Section...

Service Tax Order Passed 8.5 Years After SCN Quashed: Meghalaya High Court

The Meghalaya High Court has quashed a service tax adjudication order against the Assam...