Supreme Court Seeks Report From Union On Virtual Hearing Facilities At Tribunals

The Supreme Court has sought the report from the union on virtual hearing facilities at tribunals such as CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, AFT, NCDRC, NGT, SAT, CAT, DRATs and DRTs etc, operating under different Ministries of the union Government.

The bench of Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Justice S.V.N. Bhatti has called for a report from the Central Government on the demand of providing the facility of virtual hearing in tribunal courts. 

The petitions was filed against the Registrar General of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, alleging that the High Court discontinued the option of virtual hearing which was made available during the COVID-19 pandemic period. 

Considering a submission from the petitioner-in-person and Senior Advocate Nidhesh Gupta that the facility has now been made available, the Court dismissed this petition as withdrawn.

The Amicus Curiae submits that in the High Courts across the country, the video conferencing facility is available and is being provided. But in the Tribunals under the Union Government, efforts are needed to provide for convenient virtual hearing to the learned counsel for the parties.

Mr. V. Giri, learned Senior Counsel, pointed out that the facility to argue through virtual mode has been a great boon for women lawyers. This has considerably empowered women lawyers who for logistical and other reasons, on occasions are unable to appear and personally argue matters.

The court directed that Vikramjeet Banerjee, the learned ASG and the respective counsel will collate the necessary information on effective availability of video conferencing facility for the lawyers and litigants, in the respective Tribunals.

The court directed that the report shall be submitted within four weeks.

Read More: Govt. Notifies Empanelment Of Officers For Promotion To Grade Of Principal Commissioner Of Customs And Indirect Taxes

Case Details

Case Title: Sarvesh Mathur v. The Registrar General of Punjab and Haryana High Court

Case No.: W.P.(Crl) No.351/2023

Date: 02-01-2025

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

India Imposes Anti-Dumping Duty on Vacuum Insulated Flasks from China

In a decisive move to safeguard domestic manufacturers, the Central Board of…

Donations Of Rs. 228 Crores To Shirdi Saibaba Sansthan Is Exempted From Income Tax : Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment 

The Bombay High Court has held that the donations of Rs. 228…

Retrospective Pre-Deposit Mandate Under Central Excise Act Shakes Pending Cases: Calcutta High Court 

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that the amended Section 35F of…

Licensed Custodianship Can’t Be Granted Along Port Authority: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)…