Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesStatements, Email Printouts Inadmissible For Non-Compliance Of S. 138B, 138C Of Customs...

Statements, Email Printouts Inadmissible For Non-Compliance Of S. 138B, 138C Of Customs Act: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Statements, Email Printouts Inadmissible For Non-Compliance Of S. 138B, 138C Of Customs Act: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside the enhancement of declared import value and the consequential penalty in a furniture import case, holding that the Customs authorities failed to comply with the mandatory evidentiary safeguards under Sections 138B and 138C of the Customs Act,…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

Support Services To Overseas Group Companies Are Exports, Not Intermediary Services: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi, has held that support services...
GST

Closed Premises Alone Can’t Prove Fictitious GST Transactions: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Agra Bench, has held that finding...
GST

Seized Diary Entries Alone Can’t Establish Suppressed GST Turnover Without Transaction-Wise Verification: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Agra Bench, has held that suppressed...
GST

E-Way Bill Part B Lapse Alone Can’t Justify GST Penalty Without Intent To Evade Tax: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Agra State Bench, has dismissed a...

More like this

GST

Support Services To Overseas Group Companies Are Exports, Not Intermediary Services: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi, has held that support services...
GST

Closed Premises Alone Can’t Prove Fictitious GST Transactions: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Agra Bench, has held that finding...
GST

Seized Diary Entries Alone Can’t Establish Suppressed GST Turnover Without Transaction-Wise Verification: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Agra Bench, has held that suppressed...