HomeIndirect TaxesSIIB-Chennai Seizes Branded Footwear and Cosmetics Worth Rs. 5.9 Crore in IPR...

SIIB-Chennai Seizes Branded Footwear and Cosmetics Worth Rs. 5.9 Crore in IPR and Drug Law Violation

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a major crackdown on illegal imports, the Special Intelligence and Investigation Branch (SIIB) of Chennai Port has seized a consignment containing popular branded footwear, including Crocs and Slides, along with cosmetics, for violating Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The seized goods, falsely declared as household and miscellaneous items, have an estimated value of Rs. 5.9 crore.

According to officials, the consignment was imported under fraudulent declarations to evade scrutiny and bypass regulatory checks. The goods were found to be in violation of IPR norms, indicating potential counterfeit products, while the cosmetics failed to meet the safety and regulatory standards prescribed under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

“This seizure underscores our commitment to preventing illicit trade and ensuring that substandard and counterfeit products do not reach unsuspecting consumers,” said a senior customs official. “Such goods not only harm legitimate businesses but also pose health and safety risks to the public.”

The importers involved in this fraudulent shipment are currently under investigation, and further legal action is expected. Authorities have urged businesses and consumers to remain vigilant against counterfeit products and illegal imports that compromise safety and quality standards.

This latest seizure highlights the ongoing efforts by Indian customs to curb smuggling, protect intellectual property, and enforce strict adherence to regulatory laws governing imports.

Read More: 1.2 kg Gold Smuggling Foiled at IGI Airport

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

S. 54F Exemption on All 50 Flats Received Under JDA: ITAT 

In a significant ruling on capital gains taxation arising from Joint Development Agreements (JDAs),...

Can Service Tax Be Levied on Villas in Gated Community Merely Because They Share Common Amenities? CESTAT Says No

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Is Service Tax Payable on Rent Earned From Commercial Shops Located Within Church Premises After July 1, 2012? CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Reassessment Notice Beyond Limitation Invalid Even After Excluding Assessee’s Reply Period: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has quashed a reassessment notice issued under Section 148, holding...

More like this

S. 54F Exemption on All 50 Flats Received Under JDA: ITAT 

In a significant ruling on capital gains taxation arising from Joint Development Agreements (JDAs),...

Can Service Tax Be Levied on Villas in Gated Community Merely Because They Share Common Amenities? CESTAT Says No

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Is Service Tax Payable on Rent Earned From Commercial Shops Located Within Church Premises After July 1, 2012? CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...